LETTER: ChatGPT has none of the artistry of Chris Thurman
I assume the parts of the article that I detect to be predictable ChatGPT are not of his own writing. If they are, then what Thurman has written is twak
01 February 2023 - 17:40
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Thank you to Chris Thurman for giving carte blanche to slate what has been written in the most recent Half Art column (“AI art critic: ‘Hello dear human, welcome to the machine’,” January 27).
I assume the parts of the article that I detect to be predictable ChatGPT are not of his own writing. If they are, then what he has written is twak.
Firstly, all the bumf about “the arts are a uniquely human endeavour...” and “… bring our unique (favourite word) human perspective to the table” are clichés that a robot should be ashamed of.
Another ChatGPT special on offer is the questions, a plethora of such, all profoundly probing, of course. Five in a row, nogal: “But is that true... in a meaningful way?” When there is so much “On the one hand... on the other hand” going on in our society, ChatGPT has more than enough to go on.
And then the burning issue of art criticism, where Thurman meets his Maker, which tells him no human response to art can be considered worthy... big bad bias cancels it. ChatGPT again, playing the man, not the ball. It's the response, stupid, not the responder that brings meaning.
But the worst — and I am sure Thurman did not write this — is “AI has the potential to democratise the arts”. So, we shall be levelling the playing fields and giving more voices a chance to be heard (lovely stuff) singing “Glory be to Generic Art”, a hymn composed by ChatGPT to allow for originality to be achieved democratically.
And what artist wouldn’t want instant feedback to make his or her art more conformed to the zillion analyses that have been distilled just formoi?
Roger Graham Meadowridge
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: ChatGPT has none of the artistry of Chris Thurman
I assume the parts of the article that I detect to be predictable ChatGPT are not of his own writing. If they are, then what Thurman has written is twak
Thank you to Chris Thurman for giving carte blanche to slate what has been written in the most recent Half Art column (“AI art critic: ‘Hello dear human, welcome to the machine’,” January 27).
I assume the parts of the article that I detect to be predictable ChatGPT are not of his own writing. If they are, then what he has written is twak.
Firstly, all the bumf about “the arts are a uniquely human endeavour...” and “… bring our unique (favourite word) human perspective to the table” are clichés that a robot should be ashamed of.
Another ChatGPT special on offer is the questions, a plethora of such, all profoundly probing, of course. Five in a row, nogal: “But is that true... in a meaningful way?” When there is so much “On the one hand... on the other hand” going on in our society, ChatGPT has more than enough to go on.
And then the burning issue of art criticism, where Thurman meets his Maker, which tells him no human response to art can be considered worthy... big bad bias cancels it. ChatGPT again, playing the man, not the ball. It's the response, stupid, not the responder that brings meaning.
But the worst — and I am sure Thurman did not write this — is “AI has the potential to democratise the arts”. So, we shall be levelling the playing fields and giving more voices a chance to be heard (lovely stuff) singing “Glory be to Generic Art”, a hymn composed by ChatGPT to allow for originality to be achieved democratically.
And what artist wouldn’t want instant feedback to make his or her art more conformed to the zillion analyses that have been distilled just for moi?
Roger Graham
Meadowridge
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
CHRIS THURMAN: AI art critic: ‘Hello dear human, welcome to the machine’
JOHAN STEYN: Content creators: let AI do the heavy lifting
AI is improving in leaps and bounds
DEON ROSSOUW: Can chatbots be ethical?
Beware of ChatGPT, say cybersecurity experts
JAMIE CARR: Alarms ring for writers, teachers
KATE THOMPSON DAVY: Will 2023 be Google’s dark night of the soul?
TOBY SHAPSHAK: Bloodbath at big tech
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.