LETTER: Medical schemes are justified in RAF action
29 October 2023 - 16:30
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
The legal and moral duty of medical schemes as not-for-profit organisations to safeguard the interests of scheme beneficiaries is paramount for the protection of private healthcare in SA.
Many families are tightening their belts to afford medical scheme cover for next year. Even though the industry has tried to shelter members from contribution increases despite difficult economic circumstances, there are factors beyond schemes’ control that are driving up costs.
Medical schemes must remain true to their purpose of protecting beneficiaries’ interests, which naturally extends to containing the costs of membership for all.
The Health Funders Association therefore supports schemes in defending their members’ right to claim medical costs, as they are entitled to, from the Road Accident Fund (RAF), which was established for the benefit of all road users in SA if they are involved in a road accident.
Contributors to private health cover should not be penalised for alleviating the burden on overcrowded state facilities.
Phumelele Makatini CEO, Health Funders Association
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Medical schemes are justified in RAF action
Your editorial opinion refers (“Urgent state action required to fix RAF albatross”, October 25).
The legal and moral duty of medical schemes as not-for-profit organisations to safeguard the interests of scheme beneficiaries is paramount for the protection of private healthcare in SA.
Many families are tightening their belts to afford medical scheme cover for next year. Even though the industry has tried to shelter members from contribution increases despite difficult economic circumstances, there are factors beyond schemes’ control that are driving up costs.
Medical schemes must remain true to their purpose of protecting beneficiaries’ interests, which naturally extends to containing the costs of membership for all.
The Health Funders Association therefore supports schemes in defending their members’ right to claim medical costs, as they are entitled to, from the Road Accident Fund (RAF), which was established for the benefit of all road users in SA if they are involved in a road accident.
Contributors to private health cover should not be penalised for alleviating the burden on overcrowded state facilities.
Phumelele Makatini
CEO, Health Funders Association
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
EDITORIAL: Urgent state action required to fix RAF albatross
EXCLUSIVE: Discovery Health issues warning to RAF over refusal to pay claims
Constitutional Court hands medical schemes a win in battle with RAF
Dire state of insolvent RAF reflected in transport minister’s replies
WATCH: RAF amendment bill rattles medical schemes
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
LETTER: Judge’s overreach delays justice for road accident victims
LETTER: Medical schemes did well
LETTER: Closing the accident fund will cut out looters
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.