Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Asking whether the government should support industries in distress is only part of the question. The first question is whether the government has any business meddling. The second is, where it is a shareholder does it run the enterprise with any semblance of basic corporate governance?
In the first case the government’s own policies wrecked the sugar industry. The health promotion levy was a stake through its heart. The master plan was a bandage to stem the haemorrhaging.
The steel industry another. Our oil refining capability another. In the second case (take Eskom), the government has run the place like a spaza shop. The wrong people repeatedly put in charge, too many ministries with overlapping mandates, procurement rules that insert middlemen and drive costs and facilitate rent seeking...
Realising that competence in appointing people to manage (at all levels) a complicated technical business is always the first consideration. So sure, don’t support dinosaurs, but be honest in asking first whether daft policies and inappropriate fiddling aren’t the cause.
Martin Neethling Via BusinessLIVE
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Competence is the first order of business
Government has run Eskom like a spaza shop
Neva Makgetla churns out economically problematic columns week after week, with never a word in rebuttal (“Government needs to rethink trying to save dinosaurs”, April 9).
Asking whether the government should support industries in distress is only part of the question. The first question is whether the government has any business meddling. The second is, where it is a shareholder does it run the enterprise with any semblance of basic corporate governance?
In the first case the government’s own policies wrecked the sugar industry. The health promotion levy was a stake through its heart. The master plan was a bandage to stem the haemorrhaging.
The steel industry another. Our oil refining capability another. In the second case (take Eskom), the government has run the place like a spaza shop. The wrong people repeatedly put in charge, too many ministries with overlapping mandates, procurement rules that insert middlemen and drive costs and facilitate rent seeking...
Realising that competence in appointing people to manage (at all levels) a complicated technical business is always the first consideration. So sure, don’t support dinosaurs, but be honest in asking first whether daft policies and inappropriate fiddling aren’t the cause.
Martin Neethling
Via BusinessLIVE
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
NEVA MAKGETLA: Government needs to rethink trying to save dinosaurs
Environmental advisory forum’s guidance on Eskom emissions due soon
EDITORIAL: Pollution karma is coming
Eskom expects to spend ‘significantly’ less on diesel in 2024
DANIEL SILKE: Private sector should step up lobbying for a favourable coalition landscape
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.