LETTER: Cut jobs at bloated Eskom to avoid tariff hike
The power utility may have as many as 26,000 surplus, mainly unskilled and militant employees
06 February 2023 - 17:39
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
SA needs to understand that Eskom’s by-product is electricity — its real role is to employ 40,000 mainly unskilled and militant employees.
In 2003, Eskom generated about 39,000MW with 31,000 employees, then over the next decade and a half it went and hired another 17,000 employees even as actual generation fell.
According to Singh & Fehrs’ 2001 analysis of US Energy Information Administration data, the average coal-fired power plant employs 0.18 people in operations & maintenance per MW of peak capacity on a permanent basis. A 300MW coal-fired power plant would thus employ 54 people in operation and maintenance on an ongoing basis.
This corresponds closely with the Energy Information Administration’s assessment that in 1997 the average 300MW coal-fired power plant in the US had 53 employees.
Therefore, to produce 39,000MW Eskom needs about 7,100 people to run the coal operated fleet, and a further 600 for Koeberg. That’s 7,700 people in total.
The American Electric Power utility produces about the same power as Eskom (38,000MW) with a total of 16,000 employees, and that includes 63,000km of transmission lines.
Most of us would imagine that a power utility company would employ mainly technical skills. Yet in 2013 Eskom had 2,500 qualified engineers and in 2022 there were just 1,500, with 200 critical skills quitting each month.
By my calculation Eskom, therefore, has 26,000 surplus employees being paid a total of R15bn a year. On Eskom’s R246bn turnover we have now found an 8% potential saving.
I am sure with aggressive cost cutting we could find the other 10% and make the 18% tariff hike unnecessary.
Rob Tiffin Cape Town
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Cut jobs at bloated Eskom to avoid tariff hike
The power utility may have as many as 26,000 surplus, mainly unskilled and militant employees
President Cyril Ramaphosa's request that Eskom hold off on its 18.6% tariff hike refers (“Someone’s got to pay for the electricity, Mr President”, January 26).
SA needs to understand that Eskom’s by-product is electricity — its real role is to employ 40,000 mainly unskilled and militant employees.
In 2003, Eskom generated about 39,000MW with 31,000 employees, then over the next decade and a half it went and hired another 17,000 employees even as actual generation fell.
According to Singh & Fehrs’ 2001 analysis of US Energy Information Administration data, the average coal-fired power plant employs 0.18 people in operations & maintenance per MW of peak capacity on a permanent basis. A 300MW coal-fired power plant would thus employ 54 people in operation and maintenance on an ongoing basis.
This corresponds closely with the Energy Information Administration’s assessment that in 1997 the average 300MW coal-fired power plant in the US had 53 employees.
Therefore, to produce 39,000MW Eskom needs about 7,100 people to run the coal operated fleet, and a further 600 for Koeberg. That’s 7,700 people in total.
The American Electric Power utility produces about the same power as Eskom (38,000MW) with a total of 16,000 employees, and that includes 63,000km of transmission lines.
Most of us would imagine that a power utility company would employ mainly technical skills. Yet in 2013 Eskom had 2,500 qualified engineers and in 2022 there were just 1,500, with 200 critical skills quitting each month.
By my calculation Eskom, therefore, has 26,000 surplus employees being paid a total of R15bn a year. On Eskom’s R246bn turnover we have now found an 8% potential saving.
I am sure with aggressive cost cutting we could find the other 10% and make the 18% tariff hike unnecessary.
Rob Tiffin
Cape Town
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
EDITORIAL: Someone’s got to pay for the electricity, Mr President
LETTER: State of disaster will bring graft and state overreach
Outa wades into battle to sink powerships
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
‘Black sites’ and bribes: De Ruyter gives peek into coal corruption
Ramaphosa and SA at a fork in the road
AYABONGA CAWE: Let’s hope state of disaster will take care of spoilt food in ...
LETTER: Ethics at Eskom a matter of life and death
LETTER: Rather reallocate outrageous Spurs R1bn funding to Eskom
LETTER: National stayaway the only way to get rid of the ANC
Apply law in Eskom’s appeal on air quality decision, say activists
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.