We should not be tempted by the state for it to step in to aid the renewables equipment sector
21 August 2023 - 16:27
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
According to Trade & Industrial Policy Strategies senior economist Gaylor Montmasson-Clair, since 2012 SA has imported $10bn worth of solar panels, lithium-ion batteries and inverters (“How SA is losing out on its own renewables boom”, August 14).
Most imports occurred over the last three years, and ever more intense load-shedding has become entrenched. While this will add to the resilience of those who can afford to buy imported equipment, the flip side is the lack of growth of local manufacturing capacity and skills development.
The greatest temptation to fix this situation would be for the government to “step in” and provide subsidies for local manufacturers — and impose tariffs on imports. Ultimately, though, the costs of such interventions would in the former case be more and higher taxes to continue supporting any such plan, and in the latter case higher costs on imports that will ultimately inhibit citizens’ ability to import cheaper products and wean themselves from the failing entity that is Eskom. Such industrial policy would also fail to address the relatively lower skills base in renewable energy with which the country is saddled.
Local manufacturers of solar panels and batteries ought to proceed carefully before calling for government support. Pressure should be placed on the government to remove the bottlenecks preventing private generation and feeding back into the grid — this already would stimulate more manufacturing and industrial development in general. Fixing the issues that plague the railways and ports would significantly lower costs.
A more agile labour law regime would allow manufacturers to employ more people, [and] more flexible training and skills-development programmes. Streamlining the visa application process for skilled international businesspeople would allow them to invest and work in SA, sharing their experience and expertise along the way.
The stalling of the Renewable Energy IPP Procurement Programme illustrates the perils of relying on the government. It is one thing for the government to introduce master plans, subsidies, tariffs ... but these forms of state involvement and support do not by themselves guarantee the best market-focused businesses and products will win out.
With more reliance on the state comes the risk that, should the state fail, the damage is far wider than it would otherwise be in a more competitive market.
Chris Hattingh Centre for Risk Analysis
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: The perils of relying on the government
We should not be tempted by the state for it to step in to aid the renewables equipment sector
According to Trade & Industrial Policy Strategies senior economist Gaylor Montmasson-Clair, since 2012 SA has imported $10bn worth of solar panels, lithium-ion batteries and inverters (“How SA is losing out on its own renewables boom”, August 14).
Most imports occurred over the last three years, and ever more intense load-shedding has become entrenched. While this will add to the resilience of those who can afford to buy imported equipment, the flip side is the lack of growth of local manufacturing capacity and skills development.
The greatest temptation to fix this situation would be for the government to “step in” and provide subsidies for local manufacturers — and impose tariffs on imports. Ultimately, though, the costs of such interventions would in the former case be more and higher taxes to continue supporting any such plan, and in the latter case higher costs on imports that will ultimately inhibit citizens’ ability to import cheaper products and wean themselves from the failing entity that is Eskom. Such industrial policy would also fail to address the relatively lower skills base in renewable energy with which the country is saddled.
Local manufacturers of solar panels and batteries ought to proceed carefully before calling for government support. Pressure should be placed on the government to remove the bottlenecks preventing private generation and feeding back into the grid — this already would stimulate more manufacturing and industrial development in general. Fixing the issues that plague the railways and ports would significantly lower costs.
A more agile labour law regime would allow manufacturers to employ more people, [and] more flexible training and skills-development programmes. Streamlining the visa application process for skilled international businesspeople would allow them to invest and work in SA, sharing their experience and expertise along the way.
The stalling of the Renewable Energy IPP Procurement Programme illustrates the perils of relying on the government. It is one thing for the government to introduce master plans, subsidies, tariffs ... but these forms of state involvement and support do not by themselves guarantee the best market-focused businesses and products will win out.
With more reliance on the state comes the risk that, should the state fail, the damage is far wider than it would otherwise be in a more competitive market.
Chris Hattingh
Centre for Risk Analysis
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
WATCH: Renewables boom exposes SA’s manufacturing gap
How SA is losing out on its own renewables boom
LETTER: Coal still our best option to produce electricity
LETTER: Details needed on study of nuclear costs
LETTER: Nuclear a more reliable option
LETTER: Green lies about nuclear energy
LETTER: Gas, not green energy, could bridge energy gap
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.