LETTER: Draft employment regulations violate the constitution
Proposed rules would do more than lead to job losses and discourage new hires
07 June 2023 - 16:57
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Sandile July and Nonkosazana Nkosi address only one concern about the effect of the new draft employment equity regulations — that they will lead to job losses because individuals will be fired or retrenched (“Jobs unlikely to be lost when applying employment equity targets”, June 5).
The writers ignore the other reasons for public concern that the draft regulations will lead to job losses. Among these is the risk of companies choosing to go offshore, or going bankrupt. The regulations could lead to companies downsizing due to supply chain disruptions and depressed consumer aggregate demand. All of these factors could lead to many job losses.
Importantly, the writers fail to mention the effect of the regulations in discouraging new hires or promotions. That will affect the young and the unemployed. By ignoring these factors, the writers suggest the targets aren’t bad, so people shouldn’t be worried.
We oppose the draft regulations not only because, if implemented, they would lead to job losses, but because they are inconsistent with some sections of the constitution, as we shall be pointing out in our submission to the department of employment & labour.
First, the regulations are inconsistent with section 1 of the constitution, which expressly identifies “nonracialism” as a core value on which the democratic state “is founded”. Second, they are inconsistent with section 9 (the equality clause), which states that “everyone is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of the law”.
Third, the draft regulations will significantly change the procurement rules applicable to state entities. In this, they are inconsistent with section 217 of the constitution, which deals with the state’s procurement obligations.
Lastly, the draft regulations are inconsistent with section 195, which provides that employment and personnel management practices in state entities must be “based on ability, objectivity, and fairness”, among other things.
Mlondi Mdluli Institute of Race Relations
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Draft employment regulations violate the constitution
Proposed rules would do more than lead to job losses and discourage new hires
Sandile July and Nonkosazana Nkosi address only one concern about the effect of the new draft employment equity regulations — that they will lead to job losses because individuals will be fired or retrenched (“Jobs unlikely to be lost when applying employment equity targets”, June 5).
The writers ignore the other reasons for public concern that the draft regulations will lead to job losses. Among these is the risk of companies choosing to go offshore, or going bankrupt. The regulations could lead to companies downsizing due to supply chain disruptions and depressed consumer aggregate demand. All of these factors could lead to many job losses.
Importantly, the writers fail to mention the effect of the regulations in discouraging new hires or promotions. That will affect the young and the unemployed. By ignoring these factors, the writers suggest the targets aren’t bad, so people shouldn’t be worried.
We oppose the draft regulations not only because, if implemented, they would lead to job losses, but because they are inconsistent with some sections of the constitution, as we shall be pointing out in our submission to the department of employment & labour.
First, the regulations are inconsistent with section 1 of the constitution, which expressly identifies “nonracialism” as a core value on which the democratic state “is founded”. Second, they are inconsistent with section 9 (the equality clause), which states that “everyone is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of the law”.
Third, the draft regulations will significantly change the procurement rules applicable to state entities. In this, they are inconsistent with section 217 of the constitution, which deals with the state’s procurement obligations.
Lastly, the draft regulations are inconsistent with section 195, which provides that employment and personnel management practices in state entities must be “based on ability, objectivity, and fairness”, among other things.
Mlondi Mdluli
Institute of Race Relations
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
LETTER: Draft equity regulations are a throwback to apartheid
MICHAEL AVERY: The ideology that spawns SOE graft also foils literacy
LETTER: Race-based policies have failed — why implement them again?
LETTER: Pernicious regulations
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
SANDILE JULY AND NONKOSAZANA NKOSI: Jobs unlikely to be lost when applying ...
LETTER: Business leaders, don’t forget about BEE targets
DA to challenge new employment equity measures in court
LETTER: The ANC is getting desperate
MICHAEL CARDO: Employment equity regulations make minorities second-class ...
PIET LE ROUX AND RUSSELL LAMBERTI: An impossible employment law in a failing ...
LETTER: Draft equity regulations are a throwback to apartheid
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.