NatWest discriminated against banker with cancer, tribunal rules
Group faces a more than £2m compensation claim after unfairly dismissing her after cancer surgery
17 February 2022 - 17:17
byKirstin Ridley
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
London — NatWest Group is facing a more than £2m compensation claim after a London tribunal ruled it had discriminated against an employee and unfairly dismissed her two days after cancer surgery, her lawyer said on Thursday.
Adeline Willis, a 44-year-old risk and compliance officer who had worked at the bank for more than six years, said she was physically and emotionally in turmoil after being made redundant in 2020, eight months after a bowel cancer diagnosis.
The tribunal ruled a recorded telephone call a few weeks after her diagnosis, in which Willis's managers sought advice from the human resources department about terminating a secondment early because she was due to take time off for cancer treatment, was clear evidence of discriminatory intent.
“This has been a harrowing experience for my client who did not deserve the appalling treatment that she endured at the hands of one of this country's largest and best-resourced employers,” said Will Clayton, a lawyer at Constantine Law, who represents Willis.
“The next step is to ensure that Ms Willis is fully compensated for her losses and the discrimination that she has suffered,” Clayton said, adding the case had a potential value in excess of £2m.
NatWest said it recognises the “extremely difficult personal circumstances in this case”, adding it is reviewing the judgment and considering its position.
The London Central Employment Tribunal rejected the bank’s allegations that Willis's £160,000-per-year job was redundant, ruling that Willis's dismissal had been “tainted with discrimination”.
Cancer is listed as a disability under the UK Equality Act 2010, protecting sufferers from discrimination.
If the two sides cannot agree on the level of damages, the court has pencilled in a further hearing for April 25 and 26.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
NatWest discriminated against banker with cancer, tribunal rules
Group faces a more than £2m compensation claim after unfairly dismissing her after cancer surgery
London — NatWest Group is facing a more than £2m compensation claim after a London tribunal ruled it had discriminated against an employee and unfairly dismissed her two days after cancer surgery, her lawyer said on Thursday.
Adeline Willis, a 44-year-old risk and compliance officer who had worked at the bank for more than six years, said she was physically and emotionally in turmoil after being made redundant in 2020, eight months after a bowel cancer diagnosis.
The tribunal ruled a recorded telephone call a few weeks after her diagnosis, in which Willis's managers sought advice from the human resources department about terminating a secondment early because she was due to take time off for cancer treatment, was clear evidence of discriminatory intent.
“This has been a harrowing experience for my client who did not deserve the appalling treatment that she endured at the hands of one of this country's largest and best-resourced employers,” said Will Clayton, a lawyer at Constantine Law, who represents Willis.
“The next step is to ensure that Ms Willis is fully compensated for her losses and the discrimination that she has suffered,” Clayton said, adding the case had a potential value in excess of £2m.
NatWest said it recognises the “extremely difficult personal circumstances in this case”, adding it is reviewing the judgment and considering its position.
The London Central Employment Tribunal rejected the bank’s allegations that Willis's £160,000-per-year job was redundant, ruling that Willis's dismissal had been “tainted with discrimination”.
Cancer is listed as a disability under the UK Equality Act 2010, protecting sufferers from discrimination.
If the two sides cannot agree on the level of damages, the court has pencilled in a further hearing for April 25 and 26.
Reuters
HSBC wants to see clients’ coal exit strategies by 2023
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Law protects workers who commit offences due to illness or disability
Germany first major European nation to ban gay ‘conversion therapy’
THETO MAHLAKOANA: More support needed for mental health issues in the workplace
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.