Rusal files London lawsuit in dispute with Nornickel
24 October 2022 - 17:02
by Agency Staff
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Moscow — Rusal said on Monday it had filed a lawsuit in London alleging that Vladimir Potanin, CEO of Nornickel, is in breach of a decade-old deal, renewing a row between two of Russia’s largest metals companies.
Rusal said that the lawsuit filed in London’s high court on October 21 against Potanin and his affiliate Whiteleave is aimed at protecting the interests of Nornickel’s shareholders, adding that no hearing date had been set.
A spokesperson for Potanin’s holding company Interros, which owns 36% of Nornickel, said his team was reviewing the information in the lawsuit and declined further comment. Nornickel declined to comment.
The dispute centres on an agreement brokered by Moscow in 2012 between Nornickel’s two largest shareholders, Potanin and Rusal, which protected its dividend payouts. Rusal was at the time controlled by Oleg Deripaska.
The feud between two of Russia’s most powerful business figures over the country’s prized metal assets dates back to 2008 when Rusal bought its stake in Nornickel and Potanin opposed attempts by Deripaska to merge the two companies.
Disputes over dividends have been the main reason for on-and-off rows between shareholders at Nornickel and Rusal over the past 14 years. One of the parties to the deal is billionaire Roman Abramovich, who helped cool the dispute a decade ago.
The 2012 deal, which is due to expire at the end of this year, resolved a disagreement over how much profit should be returned to investors and how much should be invested in Nornickel. Interros owns 36% of Nornickel and Rusal holds 26.2%.
The London lawsuit comes as Moscow faces Western sanctions over what it calls a “special military operation” in Ukraine. While Nornickel has not been directly targeted by the Western sanctions, Potanin was sanctioned by Britain in June.
Rusal said it had filed the suit after efforts to enter into “constructive dialogue” on an out-of-court settlement failed.
“Under the management of Mr Potanin, Norilsk Nickel lost a number of assets that played a key role in the group’s activities. This resulted in Norilsk Nickel and its shareholders suffering significant losses,” Rusal said.
Rusal said it was seeking compensation and other remedies but did not give details on the value and said this should be determined in court.
In July, Potanin floated the idea of a $60bn merger of Nornickel with Rusal as a means of mitigating possible sanctions risks, but last month said this had been postponed.
He said the deal now at the centre of the lawsuit was on track to expire at the end of 2022. Sources had told Reuters there were no talks to renew the deal.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Rusal files London lawsuit in dispute with Nornickel
Moscow — Rusal said on Monday it had filed a lawsuit in London alleging that Vladimir Potanin, CEO of Nornickel, is in breach of a decade-old deal, renewing a row between two of Russia’s largest metals companies.
Rusal said that the lawsuit filed in London’s high court on October 21 against Potanin and his affiliate Whiteleave is aimed at protecting the interests of Nornickel’s shareholders, adding that no hearing date had been set.
A spokesperson for Potanin’s holding company Interros, which owns 36% of Nornickel, said his team was reviewing the information in the lawsuit and declined further comment. Nornickel declined to comment.
The dispute centres on an agreement brokered by Moscow in 2012 between Nornickel’s two largest shareholders, Potanin and Rusal, which protected its dividend payouts. Rusal was at the time controlled by Oleg Deripaska.
The feud between two of Russia’s most powerful business figures over the country’s prized metal assets dates back to 2008 when Rusal bought its stake in Nornickel and Potanin opposed attempts by Deripaska to merge the two companies.
Disputes over dividends have been the main reason for on-and-off rows between shareholders at Nornickel and Rusal over the past 14 years. One of the parties to the deal is billionaire Roman Abramovich, who helped cool the dispute a decade ago.
The 2012 deal, which is due to expire at the end of this year, resolved a disagreement over how much profit should be returned to investors and how much should be invested in Nornickel. Interros owns 36% of Nornickel and Rusal holds 26.2%.
The London lawsuit comes as Moscow faces Western sanctions over what it calls a “special military operation” in Ukraine. While Nornickel has not been directly targeted by the Western sanctions, Potanin was sanctioned by Britain in June.
Rusal said it had filed the suit after efforts to enter into “constructive dialogue” on an out-of-court settlement failed.
“Under the management of Mr Potanin, Norilsk Nickel lost a number of assets that played a key role in the group’s activities. This resulted in Norilsk Nickel and its shareholders suffering significant losses,” Rusal said.
Rusal said it was seeking compensation and other remedies but did not give details on the value and said this should be determined in court.
In July, Potanin floated the idea of a $60bn merger of Nornickel with Rusal as a means of mitigating possible sanctions risks, but last month said this had been postponed.
He said the deal now at the centre of the lawsuit was on track to expire at the end of 2022. Sources had told Reuters there were no talks to renew the deal.
Reuters
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.