President Jacob Zuma has not revealed what records exist on which he based his decision to axe former finance minister Pravin Gordhan and his deputy and which of these he does not want disclosed to the public. This is why the High Court in Pretoria found that it had "no choice but to issue an order that calls for a record" of the decision. "There is not a soupcon of evidence concerning a record from the president. The president has elected to remain completely quiescent in this aspect," said Judge Bashir Vally. He was providing reasons for his decision last week to give Zuma five days to submit all documents containing the reasons for the removal of Gordhan and Mcebisi Jonas. The DA had in its court application, which forms part of a broader review of Zuma’s cabinet reshuffle, raised the issue of the existence of a so-called intelligence report. The report was used by Zuma to explain his removal of Gordhan and Jonas to the ANC’s top six leaders and their South African Communist Part...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.