Patel says SA considering WTO complaint over CBAM as last resort
SA open to find a settlement but may go to World Trade Organisation if talks fail, says minister
22 May 2024 - 22:52
byWendell Roelf and Kate Abnett
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Ebrahim Patel. Picture: FREDDY MAVUNDA/BUSINESS DAY
SA was considering lodging a formal complaint at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) against the EU’s “protectionist” carbon border tariff if all other avenues failed, trade, industry & competition minister Ebrahim Patel said on Wednesday.
The EU’s proposed carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), which will impose charges on imports of carbon-intensive goods such as steel and cement into Europe, has faced criticism from some developing nations and sectors including China’s steel industry.
In October, the EU launched a trial phase of the world’s first carbon border levy, which from 2026 will impose costs on imports of iron and steel, cement, aluminium, fertiliser, hydrogen and electricity.
“We believe that first prize always is to reach agreement through engagement and negotiation and our door remains open to find a settlement with the European Union on this matter,” Patel said.
“Failing everything else, we would be obliged to take the next step which would be to lodge a formal complaint (at the WTO), but we are still continuing discussions with a view to finding an amicable solution,” he added.
A European Commission spokesperson said CBAM was designed to comply with WTO rules and would allow deductions for any carbon prices already paid abroad.
“EU domestic industry pays a carbon price. We need to make sure importers pay an equivalent price, based on the carbon content of their goods, to prevent carbon leakage and help reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” the spokesperson said.
“Carbon leakage” refers to the risk that, rather than reducing emissions, European industries would simply move abroad to avoid paying the EU’s domestic carbon price.
However, countries including SA say CBAM would penalise developing nations struggling to raise the large investments needed to reduce their industries’ CO2 emissions.
“Instead of recognising differential levels of development, it imposes a one-size fits on all firms across the world,” Patel said.
He said SA, which could take a serious economic hit should CBAM be introduced, had raised the issue of trade-related measures on climate change at the WTO in February.
The EU is SA’s largest trading partner and the current version of CBAM could lead to a reduction of total exports to the EU of 4% in 2030 (or 0.02% reduction in GDP) relative to a baseline with no CBAM, an April report from the SA Reserve Bank said.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Patel says SA considering WTO complaint over CBAM as last resort
SA open to find a settlement but may go to World Trade Organisation if talks fail, says minister
SA was considering lodging a formal complaint at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) against the EU’s “protectionist” carbon border tariff if all other avenues failed, trade, industry & competition minister Ebrahim Patel said on Wednesday.
The EU’s proposed carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), which will impose charges on imports of carbon-intensive goods such as steel and cement into Europe, has faced criticism from some developing nations and sectors including China’s steel industry.
In October, the EU launched a trial phase of the world’s first carbon border levy, which from 2026 will impose costs on imports of iron and steel, cement, aluminium, fertiliser, hydrogen and electricity.
“We believe that first prize always is to reach agreement through engagement and negotiation and our door remains open to find a settlement with the European Union on this matter,” Patel said.
“Failing everything else, we would be obliged to take the next step which would be to lodge a formal complaint (at the WTO), but we are still continuing discussions with a view to finding an amicable solution,” he added.
A European Commission spokesperson said CBAM was designed to comply with WTO rules and would allow deductions for any carbon prices already paid abroad.
“EU domestic industry pays a carbon price. We need to make sure importers pay an equivalent price, based on the carbon content of their goods, to prevent carbon leakage and help reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” the spokesperson said.
“Carbon leakage” refers to the risk that, rather than reducing emissions, European industries would simply move abroad to avoid paying the EU’s domestic carbon price.
However, countries including SA say CBAM would penalise developing nations struggling to raise the large investments needed to reduce their industries’ CO2 emissions.
“Instead of recognising differential levels of development, it imposes a one-size fits on all firms across the world,” Patel said.
He said SA, which could take a serious economic hit should CBAM be introduced, had raised the issue of trade-related measures on climate change at the WTO in February.
The EU is SA’s largest trading partner and the current version of CBAM could lead to a reduction of total exports to the EU of 4% in 2030 (or 0.02% reduction in GDP) relative to a baseline with no CBAM, an April report from the SA Reserve Bank said.
Reuters
Reserve Bank: EU’s carbon tariff may decimate jobs in SA
PETER BRUCE: Dealing with climate is messy and often unrewarding
UK’s carbon levy on imports will kick in by 2027
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
EDITORIAL: SA’s carbon crunch
PETER BRUCE: Draft power bill is a scoundrel’s charter of note
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.