subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now
The KPMG's offices at Canary Wharf financial district in London on March 3 2016. Picture: REUTERS/Reinhard Krause
The KPMG's offices at Canary Wharf financial district in London on March 3 2016. Picture: REUTERS/Reinhard Krause

New York — The US accounting watchdog on Wednesday said it has hit KPMG Netherlands with a $25m civil penalty, a record for the regulator, in response to “egregious” and widespread exam cheating at the foreign affiliate of the major audit firm.

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board cited widespread improper answer sharing at KPMG Netherlands, as well as “multiple misrepresentations” to the watchdog about knowledge of the misconduct. The board also permanently barred the firm’s former head of assurance Marc Hogeboom from the industry, chair Erica Williams said.

The widespread and “egregious” nature of the answer sharing for exams from 2017-2022 prompted the large fine, which dwarfed the board’s previous record fine of $8m, Williams said. The action also marked the first time the regulator has sanctioned an individual over such cheating, she said.

Stephanie Hottenhuis, CEO of KPMG in the Netherlands, said in a statement that the board’s conclusions were “damning”.

“It is a hard lesson, but we are determined to learn from this,” she said.

Hogeboom could not be reached immediately for comment.

It is not the auditor’s first exam cheating scandal. KPMG in 2019 agreed to pay $50m to the Securities and Exchange Commission for a series of violations, including cheating on internal training exams by improperly sharing answers and manipulating test results.

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board on Wednesday also imposed $2m in fines on Deloitte affiliates in Indonesia and Philippines.

A spokesperson for Deloitte, another of the Big Four accounting firms, did not respond immediately to request for comment.

When asked about the persistence of cheating violations, Williams said the board this year has launched a culture review initiative as part of its regular inspections process. She declined to provide further details.

“Few things erode trust like impaired ethics,” she said on a call with reporters.

Reuters 

subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.