Sponsored
Koeberg power station in the Western Cape generates nuclear energy. Picture: SUNDAY TIMES
Koeberg power station in the Western Cape generates nuclear energy. Picture: SUNDAY TIMES

Early in the morning of April 26 1986, technicians at the Vladimir Ilyich Lenin nuclear power plant started a safety test on one of its reactors. But a combination of human error and design flaws caused an explosion that breached the reactor, sending huge amounts of deadly radiation into the surrounding areas.

PODCAST | Business Day Spotlight - Government, Eskom & Sasol are on the hook for "Deadly Air"

For more episodes, click here

Subscribe: iono.fm Spotify | Apple Podcasts | Pocket Casts | Player.fm

These events are captured in the excellent HBO show Chernobyl, after the popular name for the nuclear power plant. To understand what happened and why, watch this lauded miniseries on Showmax as it walks through the accident, the conflicting interests and the unfolding of a major disaster at a breakneck pace.

But what about other nuclear power stations? In SA, we have one such site – Koeberg in the Western Cape. What are the chances it will fail in the way Chernobyl had?

There are three angles: the reactor, the people involved and the impact on the surrounding area. Let’s take a closer look at each. 

Watch the trailer

The reactor

Nuclear power reactors use heavy elements such as uranium to boil water and produce steam, which spins a turbine to generate electricity. Coal power stations work the same way, except a kilogram of uranium can generate more than a million times as much power as a kilogram of coal. This requires a careful balance inside what is essentially a giant, high-pressure and radioactive kettle. Get that balance wrong and things can go bad quickly.

And things went very wrong at Chernobyl, partly due to design flaws in its RBMK reactors. Koeberg, on the other hand, runs pressurised water reactors (PWRs). These don’t have the same flaw and are commonly used across the world, including in the US and aboard numerous nuclear submarines. Of course, there could be unknown or unacknowledged flaws, but they are more likely to be spotted because PWR designs are widely used.

Safety is a key consideration with nuclear reactors, which is why they are so expensive. The mistakes made at sites such as Chernobyl are taken into consideration, said Prof Hartmut Winkler from the University of Johannesburg's department of physics.

“The Koeberg reactors were built according to a later technology than that of, especially, Chernobyl, and their design includes additional safety mechanisms,” he said. “For example, at Chernobyl, there was no 1m-thick concrete encasement [a Koeberg feature] and so the explosion ripped the roof to shreds, and the highly contaminated, strongly radiating material escaped immediately.”

The people

Staff running a test at Chernobyl made terrible mistakes that pushed the reactor to its brink. Human error was involved in the majority of nuclear reactor failures.

Are Koeberg’s people up to the task?

It’s actually difficult to drive a nuclear reactor to its edge. The miniseries on Showmax exposes how the yes-sir culture of the USSR led to problems. One benefit of a liberal democracy is that such negligence might be stopped sooner because people are allowed to speak up. But how would Koeberg react during a problem?

In 2006, a loose bolt on one of the reactors led to blackouts in the area. Sabotage was suspected, but several investigations showed it had been a mistake. What should give comfort is that responses to the problem were relatively quick and thorough: Koeberg staff were even given lie-detector tests.

That being said, the incident was handled in a hushed fashion and Koeberg is still secretive about its procedures, as Winkler said: “I would not say the Koeberg safety record compares too badly with other, similar installations. Despite the increased difficulties faced by Eskom, I am not aware of evidence that safety standards have dropped at Koeberg in recent years.

"That, however, doesn't mean that things should not be improved. Eskom is unfortunately still stuck in the securocratic culture of the 1980s, and its communication is usually marked by terseness and lack of detail.”

So human error is still possible. But unlike Chernobyl, there are many third parties taking an interest in nuclear safety. In 2019, a blogger posted a video questioning safety at Koeberg. The site, as well as the National Nuclear Regulator, refuted the claims.

The area

After Chernobyl happened, all people living in a 30km radius around it was evacuated. Today that radius is 10km. Koeberg is less than 30km away from Cape Town. So if Koeberg went Chernobyl, would Cape Town need to be evacuated? And for how long?

This depends on the accident itself. Nuclear reactors can’t explode. But the gas that builds up in them can - and did at Chernobyl. When the heated reactor met open air, fires started. The smoke carried radiation spread widely. The chances of Koeberg exploding in a similar fashion are very low. That being said, if Koeberg has an accident as bad as Chernobyl or Japan’s Fukushima (both rated 7 on the International Nuclear Event Scale), parts of Cape Town would be likely to be evacuated, if only temporarily.

“The explosion would be far better contained than was the case in Chernobyl. What would rather happen – if a really bad accident were to ever happen! – is what occurred at Fukushima, where the problem was not so much an explosion. It would rather be the leaking and dispersion of highly radioactive material. The scale and danger associated with it would depend on the circumstances of the incident, which may lead to an evacuation,” said Winkler.

But what about the radiation? The miniseries makes one major mistake: radiation isn’t contagious – it’s more like a poison. Someone who has radiation sickness can’t give another person that radiation. But any surfaces that have radiation on them can, and that is why people are scrubbed and washed after they have come into contact with radiation. So the fallout won’t be as horrific as seen in the Chernobyl TV series.

It would still be bad, though. If Koeberg melted down, the immediate area would have to be isolated. If the resulting melted radioactive material (called corium) gets into the groundwater, there may be serious problems. But nuclear reactors are built to contain themselves – some of the reactors at Fukushima have melted down, but are still contained.

Can Koeberg go Chernobyl?

Probably not and almost certainly not in the way that accident happened. But the show is a reminder that great power comes with great responsibility. Nuclear power is incredibly efficient and safe, but become complacent and it could destroy swathes of land, empty towns and simmer for thousands of years. Chernobyl was a lesson: hopefully, the people running Koeberg have been listening.


How to get Showmax 

If you’re not a subscriber yet, you can sign up for a 14-day free trial and binge all of Chernobyl without paying a cent. Thereafter, access to a ton of local and international series, movies and documentaries costs just R99 per month. 

If you’re a DStv Premium subscriber, Showmax is included in your subscription - visit the website to sign up. DStv Compact and Compact Plus subscribers can add Showmax to their subscription for just R49pm

This article was paid for by Showmax.