subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now
President Cyril Ramaphosa. Picture: GCIS
President Cyril Ramaphosa. Picture: GCIS

In a surprise move President Cyril Ramaphosa recently approved a renewable energy plan to combat SA’s worsening energy crisis. Though a step in the right direction, there are practicalities involved in implementing sustainable changes that could suggest the light at the end of the tunnel is still far off.

The president’s announcement is a positive move for the country after more than a decade of rolling blackouts that are set to worsen in the near future as infrastructure failures become critical. The red flag for many was the vagueness in the details, as well as lack of definitive timelines for implementation of the president’s plan.

A further point of concern is the plan’s heavy focus on improving the performance of Eskom’s existing fleet of power stations, and cutting the red tape around purchasing maintenance equipment and recruiting skilled personnel. For many this is simply more lip service in an ongoing saga.

Is renewable energy the answer? Yes and no

If the country was to successfully implement a renewable energy plan, would we be well on our way to economic recovery with our eyes firmly focused on growth and development free from the shackles of Eskom’s legacy? Unfortunately, it is just not that simple.

Yes, solar energy panels hold the possibility of providing limitless power, but renewable energy requires more complex storage and management infrastructure. This is especially prudent in various business sectors. For example, grid-tied systems store energy in the power grid and even if the bureaucracy ultimately gets to your premises to grid tie, there is still a process that needs to apply.

People and businesses making investments in solar panelling must remember that the process must still be approved, authorised and linked up by the municipality itself. How quickly will this be facilitated? If historic service delivery is anything to go by it could take years. Even if it does happen timeously, how will the management of these grids unfold, because when a system like this is set up to provide power to some of our country’s largest electricity users systematic maintenance must follow.

Solar power could be a huge win for the country, but we can’t forget that it doesn’t begin and end with solar panels — and are we geared for what needs to happen beyond installation?

What about Eskom’s pay-before-you-use plan?

As home solar installations gather pace the utility has proposed that households pay a far larger portion of their electricity bill in the form of fixed charges related to the supply of electricity. This would see customers serviced directly by the utility in areas such Sandton and Soweto paying hundreds of rand per month before using a single kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity.

The serious breakdown in trust between the power utility and the power-using public leaves this plan with many fatal flaws, and should it be implemented it will be another push for users to find any means to get off the grid — meaning added pressure on installation and management of renewable options.

This proposal also does not address our country’s primary power users — business as a whole — which now have the approval from the government to self-generate instead of being forced to sustain outdated infrastructure. Either way, we are still left with the glaring issue of the long-term infrastructure management of renewable solutions.

Options for sustainable solutions

Though there have been promises of “no more excuses”, civil society is ready to take the power issue into their own hands. One solution that could nullify the government’s need to maintain renewable infrastructure and become a game-changer in SA would be the creation of “mini-grids”. These are essentially independent, decentralised electricity networks that can function separately from the national grid.

The idea of supplying electricity through mini-grids is not new; communities from the US to Cambodia have long used this approach to bring local infrastructure into regional or national grids. The beauty is that mini-grids work best when feeding power into larger distribution networks. They are easier to assemble and deploy in hard-to-reach communities and deliver electricity more reliably.

Decentralised solutions such as mini-grids are a cost-effective solution for delivering electricity. The challenge is to convince the government, policymakers and investors of the value in going decentralised, because it can be an expensive undertaking. The good news is that funding for mini grids powered by solar, hydroelectric, wind or a mix of renewables is slowly increasing, though getting the right investment arrangement depends on getting the right policies and regulations in place first — a bottleneck that could hold us back.

There is a private sector ready and waiting to better package and meet the needs of electricity consumers, but the opportunity must be made available for the private sector to become an active part of the solution. Eskom still holds all the cards and South Africans — both residential and business — are not being invited to play, so are likely to move along and begin their own game.

• Oosthuizen is partner and renewable energy expert, and Grohman director of advisory, at accounting group BDO.

subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.