EXPLAINER: ICJ to rule on SA request to halt Israel’s Rafah offensive
The ICJ’s rulings are final and without appeal, but it has no way of enforcing them
23 May 2024 - 18:02
byStephanie Van Den Berg and Anthony Deutsch
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Assistant minister for multilateral affairs of Palestine Ammar Hijazi, right, SA ambassador to the Netherlands Vusimuzi Madonsela and Zane Dangor, director-general of the department of international relations & co-operation outside the The Hague, the Netherlands, May 17 2024. Picture: REUTERS/YVES HERMAN
The Hague — The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Friday will issue its decision on a request by SA for emergency measures sought as part of a broader case accusing Israel of genocide in the Gaza war.
SA has asked the court to order a halt to Israel’s Rafah offensive and withdraw from the Gaza Strip.
What is the International Court of Justice?
The ICJ, also called the World Court, is the highest UN legal body, established in 1945 to deal with disputes between states. It should not be confused with the treaty-based International Criminal Court, also in The Hague, which handles war crimes cases against individuals.
The ICJ’s 15-judge panel — which is expanded by an additional judge of Israel’s choosing in this case because there is already a SA judge — deals with border disputes and increasingly cases brought by states accusing others of breaking UN treaty obligations.
SA and Israel are signatories to the 1948 Genocide Convention giving the ICJ jurisdiction to rule on disputes over the treaty. While the case revolves around the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories, Palestinians have no official role in the proceedings.
All states that signed the Genocide Convention are obliged to not commit genocide, and to prevent and punish it. The treaty defines genocide as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”.
What is SA’s case?
The 84-page initial filing, brought by SA three months into the war, says that by killing Palestinians in Gaza, causing them serious mental and bodily harm and creating conditions of life “calculated to bring about their physical destruction”, Israel is committing genocide against them. In hearings in January, SA focused on Israel’s failure to provide essential food, water, medicine, fuel, shelter and other humanitarian assistance to Gaza during its war with Palestinian militant group Hamas. It also referred to Israel’s sustained bombing campaign which Gaza health authorities say has killed more than 35,000 people.
On May 16, SA made a fresh appeal to the court, asking it to order Israeli forces to halt operations in Rafah, in southern Gaza, where roughly half the territory’s 2.3-million people had sought refuge from the offensive further north. It also requested the court to order Israel to completely withdraw from the entire Gaza Strip.
What is Israel’s response?
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has dismissed the genocide accusations as outrageous. Israel says it does what it can to protect Palestinian civilians in Gaza and accuses Hamas of using Palestinians as human shields, an accusation Hamas denies.
Israel says it must have the right to defend itself after the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel in which 1,200 people were killed and more than 250 abducted, according to Israeli tallies. In counter arguments on May 17, Israel said SA’s application “makes a mockery of the Genocide Convention” and asked the court to throw out the request.
What has the ICJ ruled so far?
After a first round of hearings on emergency measures in January, the court found it was plausible Israel violated some rights guaranteed to Palestinians in Gaza under the Genocide Convention. Judges ordered Israel to refrain from acts that could fall under the Genocide Convention and ensure its troops commit no genocidal acts against Palestinians.
Under the Genocide Convention, acts of genocide include killing members of a group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm and deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of the group in whole or in part.
Judges also ordered Israel to take action to improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza. In March, the court issued further emergency measures and ordered Israel to take all the necessary and effective action to ensure basic food supplies for Palestinians in Gaza.
On Friday, the court will issue a ruling on the latest request for an immediate intervention, or emergency measures, requested by SA, not the broader genocide case itself. That decision could take years.
The ICJ’s rulings are final and without appeal, but it has no way of enforcing them. A ruling against Israel could hurt the country’s international reputation and set a legal precedent.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
EXPLAINER: ICJ to rule on SA request to halt Israel’s Rafah offensive
The ICJ’s rulings are final and without appeal, but it has no way of enforcing them
The Hague — The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Friday will issue its decision on a request by SA for emergency measures sought as part of a broader case accusing Israel of genocide in the Gaza war.
SA has asked the court to order a halt to Israel’s Rafah offensive and withdraw from the Gaza Strip.
What is the International Court of Justice?
The ICJ, also called the World Court, is the highest UN legal body, established in 1945 to deal with disputes between states. It should not be confused with the treaty-based International Criminal Court, also in The Hague, which handles war crimes cases against individuals.
The ICJ’s 15-judge panel — which is expanded by an additional judge of Israel’s choosing in this case because there is already a SA judge — deals with border disputes and increasingly cases brought by states accusing others of breaking UN treaty obligations.
SA and Israel are signatories to the 1948 Genocide Convention giving the ICJ jurisdiction to rule on disputes over the treaty. While the case revolves around the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories, Palestinians have no official role in the proceedings.
All states that signed the Genocide Convention are obliged to not commit genocide, and to prevent and punish it. The treaty defines genocide as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”.
What is SA’s case?
The 84-page initial filing, brought by SA three months into the war, says that by killing Palestinians in Gaza, causing them serious mental and bodily harm and creating conditions of life “calculated to bring about their physical destruction”, Israel is committing genocide against them. In hearings in January, SA focused on Israel’s failure to provide essential food, water, medicine, fuel, shelter and other humanitarian assistance to Gaza during its war with Palestinian militant group Hamas. It also referred to Israel’s sustained bombing campaign which Gaza health authorities say has killed more than 35,000 people.
On May 16, SA made a fresh appeal to the court, asking it to order Israeli forces to halt operations in Rafah, in southern Gaza, where roughly half the territory’s 2.3-million people had sought refuge from the offensive further north. It also requested the court to order Israel to completely withdraw from the entire Gaza Strip.
What is Israel’s response?
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has dismissed the genocide accusations as outrageous. Israel says it does what it can to protect Palestinian civilians in Gaza and accuses Hamas of using Palestinians as human shields, an accusation Hamas denies.
Israel says it must have the right to defend itself after the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel in which 1,200 people were killed and more than 250 abducted, according to Israeli tallies. In counter arguments on May 17, Israel said SA’s application “makes a mockery of the Genocide Convention” and asked the court to throw out the request.
What has the ICJ ruled so far?
After a first round of hearings on emergency measures in January, the court found it was plausible Israel violated some rights guaranteed to Palestinians in Gaza under the Genocide Convention. Judges ordered Israel to refrain from acts that could fall under the Genocide Convention and ensure its troops commit no genocidal acts against Palestinians.
Under the Genocide Convention, acts of genocide include killing members of a group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm and deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of the group in whole or in part.
Judges also ordered Israel to take action to improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza. In March, the court issued further emergency measures and ordered Israel to take all the necessary and effective action to ensure basic food supplies for Palestinians in Gaza.
On Friday, the court will issue a ruling on the latest request for an immediate intervention, or emergency measures, requested by SA, not the broader genocide case itself. That decision could take years.
The ICJ’s rulings are final and without appeal, but it has no way of enforcing them. A ruling against Israel could hurt the country’s international reputation and set a legal precedent.
Reuters
ICC move may increase pressure on Netanyahu
EXPLAINER: What’s next after arrest warrants sought in Israel-Hamas conflict
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Israel tells ICJ that SA’s case makes mockery of genocide
‘Apocalyptic conditions’ in Gaza will worsen without ceasefire, SA tells ICJ
Ireland, Spain and Norway to recognise Palestinian state
Egypt to join SA’s genocide case at ICJ against Israel
SA asks ICJ to order Israel's withdrawal from Rafah
At World Court, Germany denies aiding a genocide in Gaza
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.