Blinken defends chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan to Congress
‘There’s no evidence that staying longer would have made the Afghan security forces or the Afghan government any more resilient’
13 September 2021 - 21:23
byNick Wadhams
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
US secretary of state Antony Blinken. Picture: REUTERS/EVELYN HOCKSTEIN
US secretary of state Antony Blinken prepared to defend the Biden administration’s handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal, telling legislators US forces would have been exposed to Taliban attacks if they had stayed any longer, and keeping troops in the country wouldn’t have mattered much anyway.
Blinken will appear on Monday before the House of Representatives foreign affairs committee and on Tuesday before the Senate foreign relations committee.
Monday's hearing will give angry legislators their first chance to publicly question a senior administration official over the chaotic US troop withdrawal and the evacuation of about 124,000 people, including Americans, Afghans and citizens of other countries that took place in recent weeks as the Taliban quickly advanced across Afghanistan.
Some Republicans have called on Biden, Vice-President Kamala Harris and Blinken all to resign, Reuters reports.
“There’s no evidence that staying longer would have made the Afghan security forces or the Afghan government any more resilient or self-sustaining,” Blinken’s pre-released testimony to House committee says.
“If 20 years and hundreds of billions of dollars in support, equipment, and training did not suffice, why would another year, or five, or ten, make a difference?”
Members from both parties have criticised the administration’s actions, making clear ahead of time that they would demand answers about why President Joe Biden withdrew the last remaining US troops while American citizens remained in Afghanistan, along with thousands of Afghan citizens whom Biden had promised to help evacuate because of their work with the US over the 20-year occupation.
Even “the most pessimistic assessments” never predicted that Afghan government forces would have collapsed as quickly as they did as US and allied forces withdrew, Blinken’s prepared remarks say.
“I want to know why he left American citizens behind,” Representative Michael McCaul of Texas, the top Republican on the committee, said on Fox News on Sunday. “Why did the military evacuate before American citizens?”
Blinken was set to tell legislators the US had given many warnings to Americans that they should leave Afghanistan and is still working to evacuate the estimated 100 or so who remain in Afghanistan. He said the US also wants to help all those Afghans to whom the US “has a special commitment”.
The US will hold Taliban leaders to their commitment not to let Afghanistan become a safe haven for terrorism and that the US will “remain vigilant in monitoring threats”.
But legislators also have criticised administration statements that the Taliban has kept its word on helping in some departures since the withdrawal.
Bloomberg News. More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Blinken defends chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan to Congress
‘There’s no evidence that staying longer would have made the Afghan security forces or the Afghan government any more resilient’
US secretary of state Antony Blinken prepared to defend the Biden administration’s handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal, telling legislators US forces would have been exposed to Taliban attacks if they had stayed any longer, and keeping troops in the country wouldn’t have mattered much anyway.
Blinken will appear on Monday before the House of Representatives foreign affairs committee and on Tuesday before the Senate foreign relations committee.
Monday's hearing will give angry legislators their first chance to publicly question a senior administration official over the chaotic US troop withdrawal and the evacuation of about 124,000 people, including Americans, Afghans and citizens of other countries that took place in recent weeks as the Taliban quickly advanced across Afghanistan.
Some Republicans have called on Biden, Vice-President Kamala Harris and Blinken all to resign, Reuters reports.
“There’s no evidence that staying longer would have made the Afghan security forces or the Afghan government any more resilient or self-sustaining,” Blinken’s pre-released testimony to House committee says.
“If 20 years and hundreds of billions of dollars in support, equipment, and training did not suffice, why would another year, or five, or ten, make a difference?”
Members from both parties have criticised the administration’s actions, making clear ahead of time that they would demand answers about why President Joe Biden withdrew the last remaining US troops while American citizens remained in Afghanistan, along with thousands of Afghan citizens whom Biden had promised to help evacuate because of their work with the US over the 20-year occupation.
Even “the most pessimistic assessments” never predicted that Afghan government forces would have collapsed as quickly as they did as US and allied forces withdrew, Blinken’s prepared remarks say.
“I want to know why he left American citizens behind,” Representative Michael McCaul of Texas, the top Republican on the committee, said on Fox News on Sunday. “Why did the military evacuate before American citizens?”
Blinken was set to tell legislators the US had given many warnings to Americans that they should leave Afghanistan and is still working to evacuate the estimated 100 or so who remain in Afghanistan. He said the US also wants to help all those Afghans to whom the US “has a special commitment”.
The US will hold Taliban leaders to their commitment not to let Afghanistan become a safe haven for terrorism and that the US will “remain vigilant in monitoring threats”.
But legislators also have criticised administration statements that the Taliban has kept its word on helping in some departures since the withdrawal.
Bloomberg News. More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Taliban breaking promises including over women, says UN rights chief
Twenty years after 9/11, one of the last US Marines killed in Afghanistan comes home
EDITORIAL: Two decades after 9/11, it’s back to square one
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
US needs to change tack in how it tackles terrorism
BOBBY GHOSH: Meet the new Taliban — just like the old Taliban
The 9/11 legacy: how the War on Terror was lost
Afghanistan government appointments greeted with dismay
Why Turkey seeks to guard Afghanistan gateway
GRACELIN BASKARAN: Twenty years later, 9/11 is still an intimate part of my ...
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.