Oppressive regulations no longer have the backing of science and have been abandoned by most sensible countries around the world
23 March 2022 - 20:41
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
It was disappointing that the government stopped short of removing mask mandates entirely, although that was to be expected. There are many questions to be asked in response to this. At what point exactly will the government (and whoever from the scientific and medical community is advising it) be satisfied that indoor mask-wearing can be done away with? What is the specific objective for continued mask-wearing considering that Covid-19 is becoming endemic? Must the pandemic be "over"?
If we have already transitioned from the pandemic phase to the endemic phase, is government expecting the disease to vanish entirely? Or is it waiting for an even milder variant than Omicron? Are we waiting for a specific percentage of the population to get vaccinated, when clearly most of those who remain unvaccinated have deliberately chosen not to do so?
In typical SA government fashion, the public is left completely in the dark as to what specific criteria, objectives and conditions have been considered and agreed upon before indoor mask mandates are ended. Either way, I sense that the goodwill and continued co-operation of long-suffering SA citizens is waning, and in the absence of a convincing argument to support compliance with these mandates these will become increasingly difficult to enforce.
Society needs to stand up and loudly voice our opposition to these oppressive regulations, which no longer have the backing of science and thus have been abandoned by most sensible countries around the world.
Mark Khoury Via email
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: New Covid mask rules raise many questions
Oppressive regulations no longer have the backing of science and have been abandoned by most sensible countries around the world
It was disappointing that the government stopped short of removing mask mandates entirely, although that was to be expected. There are many questions to be asked in response to this. At what point exactly will the government (and whoever from the scientific and medical community is advising it) be satisfied that indoor mask-wearing can be done away with? What is the specific objective for continued mask-wearing considering that Covid-19 is becoming endemic? Must the pandemic be "over"?
If we have already transitioned from the pandemic phase to the endemic phase, is government expecting the disease to vanish entirely? Or is it waiting for an even milder variant than Omicron? Are we waiting for a specific percentage of the population to get vaccinated, when clearly most of those who remain unvaccinated have deliberately chosen not to do so?
In typical SA government fashion, the public is left completely in the dark as to what specific criteria, objectives and conditions have been considered and agreed upon before indoor mask mandates are ended. Either way, I sense that the goodwill and continued co-operation of long-suffering SA citizens is waning, and in the absence of a convincing argument to support compliance with these mandates these will become increasingly difficult to enforce.
Society needs to stand up and loudly voice our opposition to these oppressive regulations, which no longer have the backing of science and thus have been abandoned by most sensible countries around the world.
Mark Khoury
Via email
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
LETTER: Flawed rationale for state of disaster
LETTER: Whoever chooses not to be vaccinated does so at their own risk
LETTER: Covid inquiry must be open to the public
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Ramaphosa keeps state of disaster but eases Covid rules to placate critics
New Covid rules for travellers fly in the face of scientific advice
WATCH: Ramaphosa addresses the nation on Covid-19 response
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.