LETTER: Just a political diversion
The ANC’s expropriation programme is opportunistic and aimed at garnering support ahead of next year’s general election
The decision by parliament’s portfolio committee on public works to reject the flawed 2015 Expropriation Bill shows that land expropriation without compensation is not viable and the constitutional amendment discussion is nothing more than a political diversion. The DA has long maintained that there is no need to amend the constitution, especially with regards to land ownership. Although the constitution makes provision for this potentially disastrous policy, expropriation without compensation does not solve the real issues that the land reform programme faces. Public works deputy minister Jeremy Cronin indicated that a new bill will now need to be drawn up giving clarity on expropriation without compensation, defining "specific conditions and processes" under which compensation would not be payable. Paragraph 25.5 of the constitution requires the state to make appropriate laws to "enable citizens to gain access to land on an equitable basis". Cronin confirmed that the subordinate l...
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Subscribe now to unlock this article.
Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).
There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.
Cancel anytime.
Questions? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now.