My understanding is that the Public Finance Management Act and related Treasury regulations prescribe that an organ of state “must” institute disciplinary action against, and recover the amount from, any of its officials who are responsible for fruitless and wasteful expenditure.

It seems to me that the punitive “attorney and client” costs order made against the office of the public protector in the Cyril Ramaphosa/CR17 campaign judgment qualifies as fruitless and wasteful expenditure for which the public protector must be disciplined and must reimburse her office...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.