Imported chicken is not cheaper, so let’s support local producers who create employment in SA
19 May 2022 - 17:44
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Having been on both sides of the fence as a chicken farmer, cold store shareholder and poultry distributor, I find it difficult to accept that the consumer benefits price wise when one compares imported chicken to local stock.
Imported chickens are frozen and retailers who import or buy via importers make far better profit margins on their product. Local stock is sold at a markup of 10%-18%, whereas the profits on imports are 25%-30%.
Most imports are repackaged either as a plain in-house brand or in the deli. The consumer pays the higher price regardless. One has only to visit wholesale distributors in the rural areas to see for oneself.
If local farmers stop chicken farming and everyone imports, what will become of local industries and unemployment? Most African countries have restricted or limited imports to encourage local industries. Astral and RCL foods derive profits from other interests aswell.
Solet us build a country of opportunities and not rely on imports. Importers employ a handful of staff, whereas local poultry and their subsidiaries employ in access of 500,000 people.
K Lauwrens Via email
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Local poultry producers create jobs
Imported chicken is not cheaper, so let’s support local producers who create employment in SA
The letter from SA Association of Meat Importers & Exporters CEO Paul Matthew refers ("Good for Astral, but not for consumers”, May 17).
Having been on both sides of the fence as a chicken farmer, cold store shareholder and poultry distributor, I find it difficult to accept that the consumer benefits price wise when one compares imported chicken to local stock.
Imported chickens are frozen and retailers who import or buy via importers make far better profit margins on their product. Local stock is sold at a markup of 10%-18%, whereas the profits on imports are 25%-30%.
Most imports are repackaged either as a plain in-house brand or in the deli. The consumer pays the higher price regardless. One has only to visit wholesale distributors in the rural areas to see for oneself.
If local farmers stop chicken farming and everyone imports, what will become of local industries and unemployment? Most African countries have restricted or limited imports to encourage local industries. Astral and RCL foods derive profits from other interests as well.
So let us build a country of opportunities and not rely on imports. Importers employ a handful of staff, whereas local poultry and their subsidiaries employ in access of 500,000 people.
K Lauwrens
Via email
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
LETTER: Good for Astral, but not for consumers
LETTER: Time for some sense in the chicken debate
LETTER: Localisation drive in poultry means higher food inflation and poorer quality
LETTER: Plea by local poultry producers a manipulation
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
WATCH: CEO Chris Schutte discusses Astral’s stronger performance
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.