The reckless Constitutional Court judgment on private use of dagga accepted without question the claim of judge Dennis Davis in his judgment that the history of cannabis use is "replete with racism", citing another judgment that "some sections of the population have been accustomed for hundreds of years to the use of dagga". Dagga was introduced to sub-Saharan Africa in the 1300s via Arab traders. It was not indigenous to the area. The Khoi had it for a window period of about 150 to 250 years before the Dutch arrived. The practice of smoking dagga rather than chewing it came from the Dutch. This hardly gives smoking dagga the precedent of a historic cultural practice. Cannabis is an ancient Greek word. This implies it reached Europe before Africa. One cannot therefore claim dagga has more historic legitimacy with one ethnic group than another. The psychoactive component of cultivated dagga has been steadily increasing, making modern dagga more intoxicating than older varieties. Evid...
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Subscribe now to unlock this article.
Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).
There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.
Cancel anytime.
Questions? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now.