Mpumalanga is a textbook case of the social and economic risks of the transition to a cleaner environment. Both domestic and export demand for coal are plummeting as companies, households and electricity producers move to cleaner technologies. The problem is that, as usual, the costs of the transition are being pushed mostly onto working people and the poor, in the form of job losses and more precarious local economies. The costs affect the whole coal value chain, which was historically central to growth in SA. They directly affect workers in the mines and electricity plants, many of them the mainstay of small Mpumalanga towns. They also hit the small businesses that grew up around them, ranging from coal transporters to equipment suppliers to spaza shops. In responding to the decline in coal, stakeholders have increasingly used the concept of “just transition” to legitimise demands. But some groups think it means society should save coal production at any cost, while others use it ...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.