Royalty is in the air at the moment, from the wedding to Black Panther. But most fans would never give up their votes to live in a monarchy or willingly pay to maintain hereditary rulers in the name of national pride. The land debates have brought these questions home to SA. Apartheid shaped the former "homelands" to be impoverished, underserved and governed by unelected leaders. We often overlook the extent to which the 1994 compromise involved concessions not only to white business and politicians but also to rulers in these regions. Even today there is no coherent strategy to tackle the extreme poverty and lagging government services in the former homelands. Nor is there a consistent approach to the mismatch between the commitment to national citizenship and democracy, on the one hand, and inherited authority on the other. People are simply voting with their feet. From 1994 to 2016 the share of the population living in the former homelands fell from about half to a third. About 1...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.