RAMESH PONNURU: Vaccines point to more libertarian response to Covid-19
04 August 2021 - 17:14
byRamesh Ponnuru
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
A pop up Covid-19 vaccination site at Hammons Field in Springfield, Missouri, US on Tuesday, August 3 2021. Picture: BLOOMBERG/ANGUS MORDANT
Covid-19 caseloads in the US are rising again, with the seven-day average even exceeding the peak of last summer. Just as in the spring of 2020, newspapers are running stories that the White House thinks are exaggerating the threat. Governments are reintroducing mask mandates and public-health experts are calling for more. Opponents of mandates and lockdowns are saying, as they did at the start of the pandemic, that liberty is being unjustly infringed and health fetishised.
But three things have changed since then, and all of them suggest that this time we should have a more libertarian response to the virus.
The vaccines are the most important change. They have so far proved very effective against Covid-19, including against its Delta strain. People who have been fully vaccinated are much less likely to come down with it, and much less likely to have severe symptoms if they do.
Too many media outlets are obscuring that point. “At least 125,000 fully vaccinated Americans tested positive for Covid-19,” NBC News tweeted at end-July.
Anyone who clicked through to the full story would see that it is less than 0.08% of the fully vaccinated population — raising the question of why the number 125,000 deserved its own article in the first place. The percentage of vaccinated Americans with severe Covid-19 cases, based on Centers for Disease Control (CDC) data to July 26, is 0.003%.
If a full approval from the Food and Drug Administration for the vaccines will encourage more people to get the shots, it should by all means be expedited
Ari Schulman, the editor of the New Atlantis, a journal about the effects of science and technology, put it this way over e-mail: “Vaccines fundamentally changed the game; Delta has not fundamentally changed it back.”
After all, vaccination rates among senior citizens, the age group at worst risk from Covid-19, are high. The CDC reports that 90% of them have received at least one dose of the vaccine and 80% are fully vaccinated. Children under 12 cannot yet be vaccinated, but are at very low risk. The American Academy of Pediatrics says that in the 43 states providing figures, fatality rates among children with Covid-19 were 0.00-0.03% to end-July.
The risks Covid-19 poses now are overwhelmingly concentrated among people who have chosen not to get vaccinated. We should not be indifferent to their fate. If a full approval from the Food and Drug Administration for the vaccines will encourage more people to get the shots, it should by all means be expedited.
But there has to be a limit on how much we ask everyone else to do for the unvaccinated. Our policies cannot just be the same as they were before highly effective vaccines were widely available.
In addition to having the vaccines, we have 17 months’ evidence about the effects of mask mandates and lockdowns. That evidence suggests that people have changed their behaviour voluntarily, in response to the perceived risk of infection, more than they have in compliance with governmental edicts.
Forever war
One study found that while mass mask wearing reduced Covid-19 transmission, rates of mask wearing did not correlate with the presence or absence of mask mandates. That does not mean none of these orders did any good. But it does mean that our sense of their benefits and their urgency should be reduced.
Another change since the start of the pandemic should also affect how we respond to the Delta variant: we have gone through those 17 exhausting months. What may have been necessary as an emergency measure is intolerable on a permanent basis. If the current level of danger is all it takes for governments to impose mask requirements and for normal life to be suspended, we are on the verge of declaring a forever war against the virus — and of making an irreversible alteration in the relationship between our society and our government.
The dangers could of course grow: a mutation could subvert the vaccines, for example. In that case, more coercion might be called for. Even then, though, it would be necessary to spell out, in advance, what conditions would bring about the end of any restrictions. But let us hope that Delta subsides quickly and it does not come to that.
We should hope so for many reasons. Among them is that even if, heaven forbid, the death toll rises to 2020 levels, we are probably not going to put up with a return of the Covid-19 regime we had then.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
RAMESH PONNURU: Vaccines point to more libertarian response to Covid-19
Covid-19 caseloads in the US are rising again, with the seven-day average even exceeding the peak of last summer. Just as in the spring of 2020, newspapers are running stories that the White House thinks are exaggerating the threat. Governments are reintroducing mask mandates and public-health experts are calling for more. Opponents of mandates and lockdowns are saying, as they did at the start of the pandemic, that liberty is being unjustly infringed and health fetishised.
But three things have changed since then, and all of them suggest that this time we should have a more libertarian response to the virus.
The vaccines are the most important change. They have so far proved very effective against Covid-19, including against its Delta strain. People who have been fully vaccinated are much less likely to come down with it, and much less likely to have severe symptoms if they do.
Too many media outlets are obscuring that point. “At least 125,000 fully vaccinated Americans tested positive for Covid-19,” NBC News tweeted at end-July.
Anyone who clicked through to the full story would see that it is less than 0.08% of the fully vaccinated population — raising the question of why the number 125,000 deserved its own article in the first place. The percentage of vaccinated Americans with severe Covid-19 cases, based on Centers for Disease Control (CDC) data to July 26, is 0.003%.
Ari Schulman, the editor of the New Atlantis, a journal about the effects of science and technology, put it this way over e-mail: “Vaccines fundamentally changed the game; Delta has not fundamentally changed it back.”
After all, vaccination rates among senior citizens, the age group at worst risk from Covid-19, are high. The CDC reports that 90% of them have received at least one dose of the vaccine and 80% are fully vaccinated. Children under 12 cannot yet be vaccinated, but are at very low risk. The American Academy of Pediatrics says that in the 43 states providing figures, fatality rates among children with Covid-19 were 0.00-0.03% to end-July.
The risks Covid-19 poses now are overwhelmingly concentrated among people who have chosen not to get vaccinated. We should not be indifferent to their fate. If a full approval from the Food and Drug Administration for the vaccines will encourage more people to get the shots, it should by all means be expedited.
But there has to be a limit on how much we ask everyone else to do for the unvaccinated. Our policies cannot just be the same as they were before highly effective vaccines were widely available.
In addition to having the vaccines, we have 17 months’ evidence about the effects of mask mandates and lockdowns. That evidence suggests that people have changed their behaviour voluntarily, in response to the perceived risk of infection, more than they have in compliance with governmental edicts.
Forever war
One study found that while mass mask wearing reduced Covid-19 transmission, rates of mask wearing did not correlate with the presence or absence of mask mandates. That does not mean none of these orders did any good. But it does mean that our sense of their benefits and their urgency should be reduced.
Another change since the start of the pandemic should also affect how we respond to the Delta variant: we have gone through those 17 exhausting months. What may have been necessary as an emergency measure is intolerable on a permanent basis. If the current level of danger is all it takes for governments to impose mask requirements and for normal life to be suspended, we are on the verge of declaring a forever war against the virus — and of making an irreversible alteration in the relationship between our society and our government.
The dangers could of course grow: a mutation could subvert the vaccines, for example. In that case, more coercion might be called for. Even then, though, it would be necessary to spell out, in advance, what conditions would bring about the end of any restrictions. But let us hope that Delta subsides quickly and it does not come to that.
We should hope so for many reasons. Among them is that even if, heaven forbid, the death toll rises to 2020 levels, we are probably not going to put up with a return of the Covid-19 regime we had then.
Bloomberg Opinion. More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com/opinion
WHO faces $11.5bn cash crunch as Delta variant surges
DAVID MUNRO: Quick and thorough Covid-19 vaccination offers SA’s best economic chance
JUSTIN FOX: Which US president had the best growth record? It depends on how you look at it
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
SHABIR MADHI: Covid-19 herd immunity? It’s not going to happen, so what next?
How antivaxxers are throwing a spanner in Joe Biden’s Covid-19 works
Falling UK Covid infections are welcome surprise for scientists
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.