A recent interview with ANC economic transformation head Enoch Godongwana, broadcast by Carte Blanche, has left many in a spin regarding the proposed prescription of pension fund investments into development projects. In the interview, Godongwana suggested that a decision by Standard Bank and Nedbank to halt funding for coal projects needed to be looked at in context, this being that banks do not determine economic policy. So, if the “real” policy makers find that coal projects offer material benefits for the economy as “developmental projects”, a legislated position in favour of prescription would require a change in the stance the banks have taken. A policy of prescribed asset investments would see a regulatory obligation on asset managers to invest a portion of the retirement funds they manage into the said development projects. The focus, therefore, on coal is a red herring in context of the asset prescription debate. Regulation 28 of the Pension Funds Act is a regulatory framew...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.