Guilt and shame may not be attractive words, but they are crucial to any ethical and well-functioning society. The difference between guilt and shame is fundamental. In 1946, the anthropologist Ruth Benedict distinguished between cultures of guilt and shame in her book about Japan, The Chrysanthemum and the Sword. In shame cultures, morality is defined and driven by what others expect of people. What deters or discourages people from behaving unethically is the fear of shame — the disapproval, disgrace and humiliation they would experience if other people found out what they had done. Shame is related to social conformity and control. In guilt cultures, ethical behaviour depends not on the attitudes and perceptions of others, but on people’s own intrinsic sense of how they ought to behave, on people doing what is right because it is right. In such a culture, people freely choose to behave in accordance with their internalised moral precepts. Guilt is the inner disturbance people exp...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.