The process of dealing with the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Amendment Bill since its referral back to Parliament by President Jacob Zuma in 2016 was so "fatally flawed" that the best option was to reject it and start the process again. This was the submission by advocate Michael Bishop on behalf of the Legal Resources Centre during a public hearing on the bill on Wednesday by the National Council of Provinces select committee on land and mineral resources. "Any other course [than rejection of the bill] will result in litigation that Parliament will lose," Bishop warned. At issue is the introduction of 57 amendments by the Department of Mineral Resources after Zuma’s referral of the bill. Bishop noted that the joint rules of Parliament stipulated that Parliament’s consideration of a bill referred back by the president had to be confined to the president’s reservations. He said these rules made no provision for the introduction of new amendments. The National Assembly’...
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Subscribe now to unlock this article.
Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).
There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.
Cancel anytime.
Questions? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now.