Funding problem kills off publication aimed at global audience
07 November 2023 - 08:17
byMartin Quin Pollard
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Beijing — One of the few independently funded English-language publications to cover China in depth for Western audiences, The China Project, is to close because of a lack of funding, its editor-in-chief, Jeremy Goldkorn, wrote in a post.
The China Project, which began as a newsletter in 2016 and was formerly known as SupChina, expanded to become a “news and business intelligence company focused on helping a global audience understand China”, it says on its website.
Its products included the popular China news and society-themed Sinica podcast, articles on a wide range of China-themed topics on its website, a business intelligence data product “ChinaEDGE” and organising conferences.
Staff numbers increased too. But as with a number of online-based media companies in recent years, such as Buzzfeed News, financing became a problem.
“The media business is precarious,” Goldkorn wrote in a statement on the website. “This week we learned that a source of funding that we had been counting on was no longer going to come through, and we have had to make the difficult decision to close down.”
The company sought to produce “balanced” reporting on China and US-China-themed topics. But this attracted criticism as relations between the two powers sank to new depths.
“We have been accused many times in both countries of working for nefarious purposes for the government of the other,” Goldkorn said. “Defending ourselves has incurred enormous legal costs, and, far worse, made it increasingly difficult for us to attract investors, advertisers, and sponsors. While our subscription offerings have been growing strongly and steadily, we are not yet in a position to rely on these revenues to sustain our operations.”
Media companies globally have had mixed success with subscription models.
The China Project’s subscription package offered “the internet’s best birdseye view of China” for $120 a year, which was still on offer to site visitors on Tuesday.
“We do not have a business model problem,” company CEO Bob Guterma said. “We made big plans and pursued them boldly with the full backing of our investors. But in the past six months, investor interest has dropped off precipitously due to economic and geopolitical headwinds. We became unable to sustain what we had grown into.”
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
The China Project media company shuts
Funding problem kills off publication aimed at global audience
Beijing — One of the few independently funded English-language publications to cover China in depth for Western audiences, The China Project, is to close because of a lack of funding, its editor-in-chief, Jeremy Goldkorn, wrote in a post.
The China Project, which began as a newsletter in 2016 and was formerly known as SupChina, expanded to become a “news and business intelligence company focused on helping a global audience understand China”, it says on its website.
Its products included the popular China news and society-themed Sinica podcast, articles on a wide range of China-themed topics on its website, a business intelligence data product “ChinaEDGE” and organising conferences.
Staff numbers increased too. But as with a number of online-based media companies in recent years, such as Buzzfeed News, financing became a problem.
“The media business is precarious,” Goldkorn wrote in a statement on the website. “This week we learned that a source of funding that we had been counting on was no longer going to come through, and we have had to make the difficult decision to close down.”
The company sought to produce “balanced” reporting on China and US-China-themed topics. But this attracted criticism as relations between the two powers sank to new depths.
“We have been accused many times in both countries of working for nefarious purposes for the government of the other,” Goldkorn said. “Defending ourselves has incurred enormous legal costs, and, far worse, made it increasingly difficult for us to attract investors, advertisers, and sponsors. While our subscription offerings have been growing strongly and steadily, we are not yet in a position to rely on these revenues to sustain our operations.”
Media companies globally have had mixed success with subscription models.
The China Project’s subscription package offered “the internet’s best birdseye view of China” for $120 a year, which was still on offer to site visitors on Tuesday.
“We do not have a business model problem,” company CEO Bob Guterma said. “We made big plans and pursued them boldly with the full backing of our investors. But in the past six months, investor interest has dropped off precipitously due to economic and geopolitical headwinds. We became unable to sustain what we had grown into.”
Reuters
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.