subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now
Picture: 123RF/SARAYUTSY
Picture: 123RF/SARAYUTSY

Greenpeace Africa has withdrawn its Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) application to the minister in the presidency responsible for state security to provide further information on the infiltration and surveillance of civil society organisations confirmed by the declassified Boast Report in July 2022.

A lengthy affidavit from the State Security Agency (SSA) has put to rest concerns of infiltration. However, Greenpeace Africa would still support a thorough investigation conducted by the inspector-general of intelligence as to whether the methods of surveillance of civil society organisations have at all times been legal. 

Greenpeace Africa was set to appear before the high court in Cape Town on January 18, seeking to compel the SSA to grant access to the unredacted Boast Report, which would reveal the names of the operatives involved in infiltrating civil society organisations, and all records relating to interception and surveillance conducted against civil society organisations.

The SSA prevented a court appearance by delivering an answering affidavit at the eleventh hour and stated that such records do not exist. It has refused to grant access to the unredacted Boast Report, citing section 39(b)(i) of PAIA (paras 128-139). However, the SSA gave details as to the extent of the surveillance conducted on Greenpeace Africa, and the reasons for identifying the organisation as a potential target. 

The SSA has offered that Greenpeace Africa was identified as a potential security threat because our history of protest action indicated that we might participate in further similar activities at parliament during the state of the nation address or the budget speech, due to government’s approval of the nuclear deal (paras 118-125). 

Greenpeace Africa is satisfied with some of the outcomes resulting from the application process: collectively, Greenpeace Africa, Right2Know and Right2Protest have forced the SSA to provide a transparent account of its decisions; we procured the reasons why we were flagged for surveillance; and we have obtained confirmation that Greenpeace Africa was only engaged through social media. 

Greenpeace Africa will continue to support its partner organisations also mentioned in the Boast Report, as they proceed with their respective applications, registering as an interested and affected party in the inspector-general of intelligence investigation. The withdrawal of the application, against a tender of costs from the SSA, will be against an undertaking that Greenpeace Africa be informed of the determination of the investigations into the SSA’s conduct, insofar as we relate to it.

A transparent, honest and accountable government would not feel threatened by the actions of a healthy civil society. “We will continue to demand more from our government: more accountability, more decisive action, and more transparency,” said Greenpeace Africa’s interim programme director, Melita Steele.

Greenpeace
Via email

JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.

subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.