LETTER: Energy lessons to be learnt
Solar arrays blight the landscape while nuclear energy is associated with armaments and destruction
A friend of mine is a former Eskom engineer who has just commissioned a new 38 turbine wind farm in the Cape. I mentioned that I’d seen a picture of a solar array in the US that stretched as far as the eye could see, and he said the average solar installation today must cover about 2km² to reach any sort of scale.
We agreed that the environmental impact of these schemes is awful, yet none could exceed the output of just one of the coal-fired units at one of our new power stations, like Medupi which has six such units.
Bjorn Lomborg's article made a similar point (“Climate change: solutions might be worse than the problem”, February 25). We all know we have to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels, but we cannot continue to blight the landscape with these monstrous constructions.
Nuclear energy is clean and efficient but suffers illogically from being associated with armaments and destruction. Small modular reactors are safe and clean and can be placed near to cities, where they are most needed.
France produces 70% of its electricity from nuclear. Germany closed down many of its reactors under pressure from the green lobby and has battled to supply cost-effective power. There are lessons to be learnt.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an e-mail with your comments. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Send your letter by e-mail to email@example.com. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.