Nigeria sues JPMorgan for $1.7bn over oilfield deal
US bank calls claim over transfers to former minister ‘baseless’
23 February 2022 - 19:37
byJulia Payne
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
London — A London high court began to hear a lawsuit on Wednesday launched by Nigeria against US bank JPMorgan Chase, claiming more than $1.7bn for its role in a disputed 2011 oilfield deal.
The civil suit filed in the English courts relates to the purchase by energy majors Shell and Eni of the offshore OPL 245 oilfield in Nigeria, which is also at the centre of ongoing legal action in Italy. A panel of judges in Milan acquitted the companies and executives, who all denied any wrongdoing, of bribery last March. Prosecutors have appealed the ruling.
In the court documents pertaining to the London case, Nigeria alleges JPMorgan was “grossly negligent” in its decision to transfer funds paid by the energy majors into an escrow account to a company controlled by the country’s former oil minister Dan Etete instead of into government coffers.
The trial opened with details of the claim by Nigeria's lawyer, Roger Masefield. JPMorgan will present its defence early next week. The trial will end on April 7 and a judgment will probably take several months.
In court, Masefield said Nigeria's case rested on proving two key points: there was a fraud and JPMorgan was aware of the risk of fraud. He said JPMorgan had breached its duties.
“The evidence of fraud is little short of overwhelming,” Masefield told the court.
“Under its Quincecare duty, the bank was entitled to refuse to pay for as long as it had reasonable grounds for believing its customer was being defrauded.”
Quincecare is a legal precedent whereby the bank should not pay out if it believes its client will be defrauded by making the payment.
JPMorgan’s London offices deal with business for Europe, Middle East and Africa, including Nigeria.
A spokesperson for the bank in a statement to Reuters said it was “confident that it acted appropriately in making these payments” and said the bank would “robustly defend against this claim”.
The damages sought include cash sent to Etete’s company Malabu Oil and Gas, about $875m paid in three instalments in 2011 and 2013, plus interest, taking the total to over $1.7bn. The Nigerian government at the time asked JPMorgan to make these transfers as part of the oilfield sale, court documents show.
The London case dates back to 1998 when Nigerian military ruler Sani Abacha awarded the offshore oilfield licence, OPL 245, to a company Etete owned.
The $20m price tag — of which Etete paid about $2m, according to court documents — was widely viewed by industry experts as too low given the block was expected to yield billions of dollars of crude, though it remains undeveloped.
Subsequent Nigerian administrations contested Etete’s rights to the field, triggering years of legal wrangling until a deal designed to end the battles was struck in 2011.
Etete’s company Malabu Oil and Gas handed the undeveloped OPL 245 back to Nigeria as part of a resolution agreement involving Shell and Eni.
To complete the deal, Shell and Eni paid a signature bonus of about $200m directly to the Nigerian government and then deposited $1.1bn in the Nigerian government's escrow account with JPMorgan, court documents show.
Etete’s lawyers did not comment on the trial as Etete is not a party in this suit. Shell and Eni are also not parties to the London law suit and declined to comment.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Nigeria sues JPMorgan for $1.7bn over oilfield deal
US bank calls claim over transfers to former minister ‘baseless’
London — A London high court began to hear a lawsuit on Wednesday launched by Nigeria against US bank JPMorgan Chase, claiming more than $1.7bn for its role in a disputed 2011 oilfield deal.
The civil suit filed in the English courts relates to the purchase by energy majors Shell and Eni of the offshore OPL 245 oilfield in Nigeria, which is also at the centre of ongoing legal action in Italy. A panel of judges in Milan acquitted the companies and executives, who all denied any wrongdoing, of bribery last March. Prosecutors have appealed the ruling.
In the court documents pertaining to the London case, Nigeria alleges JPMorgan was “grossly negligent” in its decision to transfer funds paid by the energy majors into an escrow account to a company controlled by the country’s former oil minister Dan Etete instead of into government coffers.
The trial opened with details of the claim by Nigeria's lawyer, Roger Masefield. JPMorgan will present its defence early next week. The trial will end on April 7 and a judgment will probably take several months.
In court, Masefield said Nigeria's case rested on proving two key points: there was a fraud and JPMorgan was aware of the risk of fraud. He said JPMorgan had breached its duties.
“The evidence of fraud is little short of overwhelming,” Masefield told the court.
“Under its Quincecare duty, the bank was entitled to refuse to pay for as long as it had reasonable grounds for believing its customer was being defrauded.”
Quincecare is a legal precedent whereby the bank should not pay out if it believes its client will be defrauded by making the payment.
JPMorgan’s London offices deal with business for Europe, Middle East and Africa, including Nigeria.
A spokesperson for the bank in a statement to Reuters said it was “confident that it acted appropriately in making these payments” and said the bank would “robustly defend against this claim”.
The damages sought include cash sent to Etete’s company Malabu Oil and Gas, about $875m paid in three instalments in 2011 and 2013, plus interest, taking the total to over $1.7bn. The Nigerian government at the time asked JPMorgan to make these transfers as part of the oilfield sale, court documents show.
The London case dates back to 1998 when Nigerian military ruler Sani Abacha awarded the offshore oilfield licence, OPL 245, to a company Etete owned.
The $20m price tag — of which Etete paid about $2m, according to court documents — was widely viewed by industry experts as too low given the block was expected to yield billions of dollars of crude, though it remains undeveloped.
Subsequent Nigerian administrations contested Etete’s rights to the field, triggering years of legal wrangling until a deal designed to end the battles was struck in 2011.
Etete’s company Malabu Oil and Gas handed the undeveloped OPL 245 back to Nigeria as part of a resolution agreement involving Shell and Eni.
To complete the deal, Shell and Eni paid a signature bonus of about $200m directly to the Nigerian government and then deposited $1.1bn in the Nigerian government's escrow account with JPMorgan, court documents show.
Etete’s lawyers did not comment on the trial as Etete is not a party in this suit. Shell and Eni are also not parties to the London law suit and declined to comment.
Reuters
JOHN KEMP: Shrinking oil inventories could cause market to boil over
IAN BREMMER: Global strife burns longer and hotter as US and major powers step back
ISMAIL LAGARDIEN: What’s next for the global political economy?
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.