subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now
White House press secretary Jen Psaki at a press briefing at the White House in Washington, the US. Picture: REUTERS/JONATHAN ERNST
White House press secretary Jen Psaki at a press briefing at the White House in Washington, the US. Picture: REUTERS/JONATHAN ERNST

White House press secretary Jen Psaki accused China of “stonewalling” a WHO investigation into origins of the coronavirus, including the possibility it escaped a Chinese lab, after Beijing said it wouldn’t participate.

“We are deeply disappointed,” Psaki told a media briefing. “Their position is irresponsible and, frankly, dangerous.”

The WHO’s proposed phase-two investigation of the virus’s origins “is about saving lives in the future”, she said. “It’s not a time to be stonewalling.”

Chinese officials said on Thursday there wasn’t evidence for the theory that the virus leaked from a laboratory in Wuhan, where it was first observed in humans, and that no further resources should be put into such a probe.

The pathogen most likely arose in an animal, which transmitted it to humans via an intermediate host, a group of top Chinese science officials insisted at a briefing in Beijing. They praised an earlier WHO report that pointed primarily to animals as the probable source of the virus and called for a worldwide search for the genesis of the outbreak, while saying that the lab leak hypothesis was “extremely impossible”

The Wuhan laboratory at the centre of the controversy “never had the virus”, said Liang Wannian, an epidemiologist who headed the team of Chinese experts working with the WHO. “There’s no need for us to put more resources into a lab leak probe.”

China hit back at Psaki’s comments on Friday. Foreign ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian told a media briefing that some people in the US were trying to smear China and also criticised Washington’s handling of the virus. “It is the actions and the moves of the US that have deeply disappointed Americans and the international community,” he said.

Conspiracy theory

The lab hypothesis was once dismissed as a conspiracy theory by opponents of former US president Donald Trump, whose administration raised the possibility before the 2020 election. The premise subsequently gained traction as scientists questioned China’s reluctance to provide access to primary source material and whether some research at the Wuhan facility involved making viruses stronger, called “gain of function”. Some world leaders called for a deeper probe.

While China has consistently rejected the hypothesis, officials sought to draw a line in the sand on Thursday, signalling that Beijing won’t engage on the origin probe if the theory remained in play. It was China’s most direct pushback on calls from the WHO and others to investigate the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s high-level lab, which studied bat-borne pathogens and other coronaviruses.

“The plan on the second phase of the origin study contains language that does not respect science or common sense,” said Zeng Yixin, vice-minister of the National Health Commission. “We won’t follow such a plan.”

Alternative theories

The hunt for the virus’s origin has been shrouded in controversy, with officials in Beijing and Washington pushing alternative theories about how the pathogen emerged.

US President Joe Biden in May said the country’s intelligence groups were divided on whether the virus emerged from human contact with animals or from a laboratory accident, and he ordered them to “redouble their efforts” and report back by late August. The move renewed suspicion that the virus could have escaped from the Wuhan lab.

Chinese officials said they are committed to uncovering the origins of the novel coronavirus, a matter that deserves serious study and should be based on science. The WHO’s plans to make the lab-leak hypothesis a priority for the next stage of research has been contaminated by political posturing and displays “arrogance against science”. Zeng said.

‘Patient zero’

It’s likely that the initial case found on Dec. 8, 2019, wasn’t the Patient Zero, a term that indicates the first person to be infected with a new virus, the officials said. They repeated calls for broadening the effort to a global investigation into the source of the outbreak, including an examination of whether the pathogen could have first emerged in bats outside China.

“If the origin tracing studies are to be continued, I think the part-one outcomes indicate that bats should be made a priority globally,” Liang said.

“We should not confine the research only to China. Anywhere that is home to a large number of bats can be made the future destination for origin tracing studies,” he said. “This is the area we need to pay the most attention to.”

China has been in the crosshairs since the start of the pandemic in late 2019, after being criticised for delaying research efforts and restricting the access of independent investigators. Global leaders including the head of the WHO, the Australian government and others are now calling on Beijing to co-operate with the next stage of deciphering the virus’s creation story, which is essential to understanding what befell the globe and reducing the risk of future pandemics.

WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in March said the global body’s first probe didn’t adequately analyse the possibility of a lab accident before concluding it’s most likely the pathogen spread from bats to humans via another animal. He said scientists would benefit from “full access to data”, including biological samples from at least September 2019, and that he was willing to deploy more resources to investigate.

Wildlife link

Vendors in the central Chinese city of Wuhan, including at the Huanan seafood market tied to some of the earliest Covid cases, were selling live wild animals known to harbour coronaviruses when the outbreak began, according to a study published in June.

The presence of these mammals, which may have acted as a conduit through which Sars-CoV-2 was introduced to humans, contradicts information researchers were given in January. People running the market told the WHO-led team that animals sold there were from licensed farms. The researchers said they couldn’t verify reports of live animal sales.

Liang said Chinese authorities weren’t aware of the situation when investigators visited the market in January and February, a year after the outbreak led to its closure.

Bloomberg News. More stories like this are available on

subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.