In dire report, Pentagon warns of US bases imperiled by climate change
Washington — The US defence department has issued a dire report on how climate change could affect the nation’s armed forces and security, warning that rising seas could inundate coastal bases and drought-fueled wildfires could endanger inland ones.
The 22-page assessment delivered to Congress on Thursday says about two-thirds of 79 mission-essential military installations in the US that were reviewed are vulnerable to current or future flooding, with more than half vulnerable to current or future drought. About half also are at risk from wildfires, including the threat of mudslides and erosion from rains following the blazes.
“The effects of a changing climate are a national security issue with potential impacts to department of defence missions, operational plans and installations,” defence department spokesperson Heather Babb said in an e-mail.
The report, which was mandated by Congress, describes widespread impacts, dispersed across the US, with more coastal flooding along the East coast and Hawaii.
US military facilities are already encountering some of the effects, the Pentagon says, noting that joint base Langley-Eustis in Virginia has experienced 35.5cm of sea level rise since 1930. And navy base Coronado in California already experiences flooding during tropical storm events.
In the Washington area, several defence department sites — including joint base Andrews, home of Air Force One — are experiencing drought conditions that have been severe for the past 16 years, the report says. These conditions can lead to ruptured utility lines and cracked roads, the Pentagon warns, as moisture disappears from soil.
The defence department stresses in its report that it is working with nations around the world “to understand and plan for future potential mission impacts” from climate change, describing it as “a global issue”.
Under the Obama administration, the effects of climate on the nation’s military was a top initiative, but the Trump administration has taken a different tack. In a reversal, climate change was omitted in 2017 as a threat from the US national security strategy, a list of threats facing the nation.
“Given future global energy demand, much of the developing world will require fossil fuels, as well as other forms of energy, to power their economies and lift their people out of poverty,” the 2017 strategy said. “US leadership is indispensable to countering an anti-growth energy agenda.”
The Obama administration had warned that climate change was an “urgent and growing threat to our national security”.