EUSTACE DAVIE: SA bucks global trend of privatising power structures
To remove potential conflict between Eskom and IPPs the transmission grid should be owned by an independent management company
22 January 2024 - 05:00
byEustace Davie
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
A longer-term Southern African objective could include connecting all IPPs in Southern Africa to a common grid that eventually covers all sub-Saharan grids. Picture: SUPPLIED
Worldwide experience has revealed that a government-owned vertical monopoly in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity is the most inefficient arrangement for attaining the lowest-cost and most reliable delivery to consumers.
Many countries have thus set out to remedy the deficiencies by changing their electricity distribution and generation structures. The SA government, which inherited an electricity monopoly from its pre-democracy predecessor, did not embark on urgently needed reform to bring the country’s electricity system into line with modern experience.
The state-owned enterprise (SOE) Eskom now probably embodies a case study of everything that should not be done if a government wishes to achieve the best electricity results for its citizens. SA’s experience with its electricity delivery systems has demonstrated that such systems should be planned and developed with great care. Experience has shown electricity generation and delivery systems should not be undertaken by teams under the control of government officials.
To remove potential conflict between Eskom and the entry of independent power producers (IPPs) the transmission grid should be owned and managed by an experienced independent grid management company.
The UK government sold its transmission grid to the National Power Company, subject to price and other regulation by Ofgem to solve this problem. In 2009 the EU issued a directive to member countries that reads: “Without effective separation of networks from activities of generation and supply [effective unbundling] there is an inherent risk of discrimination, not only in the operation of the network but also in the incentives for vertically integrated undertakings to invest adequately in their networks.”
A longer-term Southern African objective could include connecting all IPPs in Southern Africa to a common grid that eventually covers all sub-Saharan grids, which would link with the SA and sub-Saharan grids as they extend northwards.
As this process occurs it would appear from the American experience and the growth of production in the southern areas of Africa, that a good case can be made for the establishment of a competent organisation, similar to the North American Electricity Reliability Corporation (NERC), to monitor the additions to the African grids to ensure reliability and security.
Reduction of risks
The NERC is a not-for-profit international regulatory authority whose mission is to assure the effective reduction of risks to the reliability and security of the grid. It develops and enforces reliability standards and annually assesses seasonal and long‐term reliability. It monitors the bulk power system through system awareness, and educates, trains and certifies industry personnel.
The NERC’s area of responsibility spans US, Canada and the northern portion of Baja California in Mexico. It is the electric reliability organisation for North America, subject to oversight by the federal energy regulatory commission and governmental authorities in Canada. NERC’s area of authority therefore includes owners and operators of the bulk power system, which serves nearly 400-million people.
Details were recently revealed of plans to create a grid that would incorporate the following 12 sub-Saharan countries: SA, Mozambique, Burundi, Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Ethiopia, Sudan, Chad, Nigeria, Malawi and Niger. The team of electricity economists that conducted the cost calculations for this large African project were from China, Turkey and Nigeria.
The plans are in the initial stages, but all aspects of the feasibility of the project have apparently been confirmed in principle. Should the project be adopted and confirmed, SA will have to conduct much groundwork.
Participation in such a project may be just what Eskom needs to bring it out of the load-shedding malaise into which the SOE has fallen. A substantial change in the management of Eskom would be inevitable.
In the longer term, if the building of the envisaged power grid is completed successfully and in good time, the integrated grids would transform the economies of the entire Sub-Saharan Africa.
• Davie is a director of the Free Market Foundation and author of ‘Unchain the child’ . He writes in his personal capacity.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
EUSTACE DAVIE: SA bucks global trend of privatising power structures
To remove potential conflict between Eskom and IPPs the transmission grid should be owned by an independent management company
Worldwide experience has revealed that a government-owned vertical monopoly in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity is the most inefficient arrangement for attaining the lowest-cost and most reliable delivery to consumers.
Many countries have thus set out to remedy the deficiencies by changing their electricity distribution and generation structures. The SA government, which inherited an electricity monopoly from its pre-democracy predecessor, did not embark on urgently needed reform to bring the country’s electricity system into line with modern experience.
The state-owned enterprise (SOE) Eskom now probably embodies a case study of everything that should not be done if a government wishes to achieve the best electricity results for its citizens. SA’s experience with its electricity delivery systems has demonstrated that such systems should be planned and developed with great care. Experience has shown electricity generation and delivery systems should not be undertaken by teams under the control of government officials.
To remove potential conflict between Eskom and the entry of independent power producers (IPPs) the transmission grid should be owned and managed by an experienced independent grid management company.
The UK government sold its transmission grid to the National Power Company, subject to price and other regulation by Ofgem to solve this problem. In 2009 the EU issued a directive to member countries that reads: “Without effective separation of networks from activities of generation and supply [effective unbundling] there is an inherent risk of discrimination, not only in the operation of the network but also in the incentives for vertically integrated undertakings to invest adequately in their networks.”
A longer-term Southern African objective could include connecting all IPPs in Southern Africa to a common grid that eventually covers all sub-Saharan grids, which would link with the SA and sub-Saharan grids as they extend northwards.
As this process occurs it would appear from the American experience and the growth of production in the southern areas of Africa, that a good case can be made for the establishment of a competent organisation, similar to the North American Electricity Reliability Corporation (NERC), to monitor the additions to the African grids to ensure reliability and security.
Reduction of risks
The NERC is a not-for-profit international regulatory authority whose mission is to assure the effective reduction of risks to the reliability and security of the grid. It develops and enforces reliability standards and annually assesses seasonal and long‐term reliability. It monitors the bulk power system through system awareness, and educates, trains and certifies industry personnel.
The NERC’s area of responsibility spans US, Canada and the northern portion of Baja California in Mexico. It is the electric reliability organisation for North America, subject to oversight by the federal energy regulatory commission and governmental authorities in Canada. NERC’s area of authority therefore includes owners and operators of the bulk power system, which serves nearly 400-million people.
Details were recently revealed of plans to create a grid that would incorporate the following 12 sub-Saharan countries: SA, Mozambique, Burundi, Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Ethiopia, Sudan, Chad, Nigeria, Malawi and Niger. The team of electricity economists that conducted the cost calculations for this large African project were from China, Turkey and Nigeria.
The plans are in the initial stages, but all aspects of the feasibility of the project have apparently been confirmed in principle. Should the project be adopted and confirmed, SA will have to conduct much groundwork.
Participation in such a project may be just what Eskom needs to bring it out of the load-shedding malaise into which the SOE has fallen. A substantial change in the management of Eskom would be inevitable.
In the longer term, if the building of the envisaged power grid is completed successfully and in good time, the integrated grids would transform the economies of the entire Sub-Saharan Africa.
• Davie is a director of the Free Market Foundation and author of ‘Unchain the child’ . He writes in his personal capacity.
Q&A: Scatec sees private producers emerging as SA’s generating engine
HILTON TROLLIP: Breaking the system for profit — and how Karpowership stands to gain
KEITH WEBB: ‘Quick wins’ can be unlocked to better utilise SA’s grid infrastructure
LUNGILE MASHELE: Socioeconomic spending by IPPs needs a revamp
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Bid window 7 will have ‘reserve bids’ to secure grid capacity
Advisory council takes tough stance on woeful state of electricity system
NICHOLAS WOODE-SMITH: Privatisation reveals the solution to infrastructure ...
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.