Angry reactions to president saying he does not have legal duty to end load-shedding
28 February 2023 - 10:29
by Kyle Zeeman
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
President Cyril Ramaphosa has responded to the court application, saying he has not failed to perform his duties over the power crisis. Picture: GCIS
President Cyril Ramaphosa's response to a constitutional challenge on SA’s power crisis has sparked strong reaction.
Nineteen applicants, including opposition political parties, civil society organisations, and the National Union of Metalworkers of SA (Numsa), filed an application with the high court in Pretoria arguing political failure to keep the lights on is a breach of the constitution.
According to the Mail and Guardian, the president opposed the application in his own capacity and on behalf of government, arguing that neither he nor government had failed to fulfil their obligations because the law places the responsibility for providing electricity with municipalities.
“It is now accepted that municipalities are in law required to provide water and electricity to their people as a matter of public duty. This duty does not lie with the president or any of the national departments cited herein as respondents.
“The mere fact that the president’s best efforts may not have produced the results desired by the applicants in this case does not mean that the president has ‘failed to uphold, defend and respect the constitution as the supreme law of the republic’ as suggested by the applicants”, Ramaphosa said in his answering affidavit.
The application is in two parts: the first asking for the state to be compelled to exempt certain sectors from load-shedding, and the other to declare that President Cyril Ramaphosa, Eskom, public enterprises minister Pravin Gordhan, mineral resources & energy minister Gwede Mantashe and the government have failed to protect and uphold the Bill of Rights.
The first part is to be heard on March 20 and the second on May 23.
Ramaphosa’s response to the court challenge drew an outcry from some quarters, with many taking aim at the president.
I don’t have a legal duty to end load-shedding, says Ramaphosahttps://t.co/Z6bXtFHLnS This is the worse bizarre response from President Cyril Ramaphosa to our application calling on him as a head of state to stop blackouts what a disaster of a President in the 21st century?
“Dissolving yourself of accountability is just not correct”
this is the frustrating thing about President Ramaphosa. In as much as this is to some degree true, you don't want your president speaking like this. You need to inspire confidence in your people, shit is bad rn, dissolving yourself of accountability is just not correct. https://t.co/IwxK0IRIRb
“Surely you have a moral duty to do what's best for our country”
Even if you argue you have no legal duty, surely you have a MORAL duty to do what is best for our country's economy and people, or what say you @CyrilRamaphosa@PresidencyZA? I don’t have a legal duty to end load-shedding, says Ramaphosa https://t.co/ahSUGOOlFa
President Ramaphosa says it's municipalities' fault that we have no power, forgetting that municipalities are not the ones that determine the national loadshedding prerogatives, nor even the need for loadshedding to start off with!! pic.twitter.com/R19gGN2Vfr
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Angry reactions to president saying he does not have legal duty to end load-shedding
President Cyril Ramaphosa's response to a constitutional challenge on SA’s power crisis has sparked strong reaction.
Nineteen applicants, including opposition political parties, civil society organisations, and the National Union of Metalworkers of SA (Numsa), filed an application with the high court in Pretoria arguing political failure to keep the lights on is a breach of the constitution.
According to the Mail and Guardian, the president opposed the application in his own capacity and on behalf of government, arguing that neither he nor government had failed to fulfil their obligations because the law places the responsibility for providing electricity with municipalities.
“It is now accepted that municipalities are in law required to provide water and electricity to their people as a matter of public duty. This duty does not lie with the president or any of the national departments cited herein as respondents.
“The mere fact that the president’s best efforts may not have produced the results desired by the applicants in this case does not mean that the president has ‘failed to uphold, defend and respect the constitution as the supreme law of the republic’ as suggested by the applicants”, Ramaphosa said in his answering affidavit.
The application is in two parts: the first asking for the state to be compelled to exempt certain sectors from load-shedding, and the other to declare that President Cyril Ramaphosa, Eskom, public enterprises minister Pravin Gordhan, mineral resources & energy minister Gwede Mantashe and the government have failed to protect and uphold the Bill of Rights.
The first part is to be heard on March 20 and the second on May 23.
Ramaphosa’s response to the court challenge drew an outcry from some quarters, with many taking aim at the president.
Here's a look at some of the reactions:
He thinks government is for vibes?
“What a disaster of a president”
“Ramaphosa must go”
“Why did he cut his trip short then?”
“Dissolving yourself of accountability is just not correct”
“Surely you have a moral duty to do what's best for our country”
A march in solidarity
“What's next, he isn't obligated to end crime and corruption?”
Support independent journalism by subscribing to the Sunday Times. Just R20 for the first month.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Eskom spokesperson Sikonathi Mantshantsha leaves the utility
CLAIRE BISSEKER: Budgetary sleight-of-hand hides true fiscal picture
What De Ruyter knows about crime and corruption at Eskom
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.