No jury could find that Elon Musk did not act recklessly, US judge rules
This is a big victory for investors alleging Musk inflated stock prices by making misleading and false statements, causing billions in damages
11 May 2022 - 11:51
by Hyunjoo Jin
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Picture: REUTERS/JOE SKIPPER.
San Francisco — A court said that Elon Musk’s 2018 tweets that funding was secured to take Tesla private were inaccurate and reckless, saying “there was nothing concrete” about financing from Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund at that time.
The decision by US district judge Edward Chen of San Francisco is a major victory for investors alleging that Musk inflated stock prices by making false and misleading statements, causing billions of damages.
In 2018, Musk met representatives of the Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund and had a discussion about taking Tesla private, but evidence shows that “there was nothing concrete about funding coming from the PIF”, the judge wrote.
“Rather, discussions between Tesla and the PIF were clearly at the preliminary stage.
“No reasonable jury could find that Musk did not act recklessly given his clear knowledge of the discussions,” he said.
He said details such as the total amount of funding needed to take Tesla private or the price to be paid for Tesla stock were not discussed.
The summary judgment, made on April 1, was sealed for more than a month before it was publicly available on Tuesday.
“It is hugely significant,” shareholder attorney Nicholas Porritt, a partner at Levi & Korsinsky said.
He said it is that class-action plaintiffs get summary judgment on falsity and scienter before going to a jury trial, scheduled in January.
The remaining issue is what damages the intentionally false statement has caused to shareholders, he said.
The judge refused to grant shareholders summary judgment on the question of whether or not the allegedly false statements actually affected Tesla’s share prices.
Musk’s lawyer, who has filed motions to undo the court decision, was not immediately available for comments. Musk said recently that funding was actually secured to take Tesla private in 2018.
The latest ruling was in line with a complaint by the US security regulator, which sued Musk for fraud charges for the tweets in 2018. He settled with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), stepping down as Tesla chair, paying fines and agreeing to have a lawyer approve some of his tweets before posting them.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
No jury could find that Elon Musk did not act recklessly, US judge rules
This is a big victory for investors alleging Musk inflated stock prices by making misleading and false statements, causing billions in damages
San Francisco — A court said that Elon Musk’s 2018 tweets that funding was secured to take Tesla private were inaccurate and reckless, saying “there was nothing concrete” about financing from Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund at that time.
The decision by US district judge Edward Chen of San Francisco is a major victory for investors alleging that Musk inflated stock prices by making false and misleading statements, causing billions of damages.
In 2018, Musk met representatives of the Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund and had a discussion about taking Tesla private, but evidence shows that “there was nothing concrete about funding coming from the PIF”, the judge wrote.
“Rather, discussions between Tesla and the PIF were clearly at the preliminary stage.
“No reasonable jury could find that Musk did not act recklessly given his clear knowledge of the discussions,” he said.
He said details such as the total amount of funding needed to take Tesla private or the price to be paid for Tesla stock were not discussed.
The summary judgment, made on April 1, was sealed for more than a month before it was publicly available on Tuesday.
“It is hugely significant,” shareholder attorney Nicholas Porritt, a partner at Levi & Korsinsky said.
He said it is that class-action plaintiffs get summary judgment on falsity and scienter before going to a jury trial, scheduled in January.
The remaining issue is what damages the intentionally false statement has caused to shareholders, he said.
The judge refused to grant shareholders summary judgment on the question of whether or not the allegedly false statements actually affected Tesla’s share prices.
Musk’s lawyer, who has filed motions to undo the court decision, was not immediately available for comments. Musk said recently that funding was actually secured to take Tesla private in 2018.
The latest ruling was in line with a complaint by the US security regulator, which sued Musk for fraud charges for the tweets in 2018. He settled with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), stepping down as Tesla chair, paying fines and agreeing to have a lawyer approve some of his tweets before posting them.
Reuters
Elon Musk says he would allow Donald Trump back on Twitter
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Musk triggers sarcasm and anger with tweet over Japan’s birth rate
Elon Musk plans to grow Twitter’s revenue and cut advertising
Musk’s new Twitter funding may face US regulatory scrutiny
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.