subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now
Picture: 123RF/AKKAMULATOR
Picture: 123RF/AKKAMULATOR

Japan’s top court has that a legal clause requiring people to undergo sterilisation surgery if they want to legally change their gender is unconstitutional.

Several international organisations including the European Court of Human Rights, the World Professional Association for Transgender Health and UN experts had said the requirement was discriminatory and infringed upon human rights.

While rights group welcomed the landmark verdict, Wednesday’s decision by the supreme court judges to ask a lower court to deliberate on a separate clause, requiring that the genital organs of people who want to change their gender resemble those of the opposite gender, was met with disappointment.

“This decision was very unexpected and I’m very surprised,” the plaintiff, identified only as a transgender woman under the age of 50, said in a statement read out by her lawyers. She added, however, that she was “disappointed” that a decision on the other clause had been postponed.

Some lawmakers and women’s groups in socially conservative Japan had said a ruling that challenges the existing law would sow confusion and undermine women’s rights. The Supreme Court rejected a similar bid to scrap the sterilisation requirement in 2019.

Human Rights Watch said Wednesday’s ruling meant the government now had to follow up.

“The government is under the obligation to make any laws constitutional so the government now needs to act quickly to remove the clause,” said Kanae Doi, Japan director of the rights group. “It’s late, but never too late.”

Japanese law states that people who want to change gender must present a diagnosis of gender dysphoria and meet five requirements: being at least 18 years old; not being married; not having underage children; having genital organs that resemble those of the opposite gender; and having no reproductive glands or ones that have permanently lost their function.

The plaintiff’s lawyers had said that the last two requirements violated their client’s constitutional right to pursue happiness and live without discrimination, and posed significant physical pain and financial burden to transgender people.

While many countries have moved to repeal laws requiring surgery to legally change gender, transgender rights remain controversial in Japan.

A petition organised by seven groups that support the surgery requirements had collected more than 20,000 signatures by Tuesday.

Protect the Definition of Women, a group that supports upholding the surgery requirement, submitted a separate petition to the Supreme Court last week, arguing that dropping the requirement would “significantly violate women’s rights and dignity”.

Last month a group of lawmakers from the ruling Liberal Democratic Party issued a statement saying any ruling that deemed the law unconstitutional would cause confusion. 

Reuters

subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.