Apple urges California judge to reject Epic Games’ bid to hold it in contempt
The iPhone maker denies violating a court order to give developers greater freedom to guide app users to alternative payment methods for digital goods
14 April 2024 - 17:56
byMike Scarcella
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
iPhone maker Apple on Friday denied violating a court order governing its App Store and urged a California federal judge to reject a request by Fortnite developer Epic Games to hold it in contempt.
Apple made the arguments in a filing to US district judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, who presided over Epic’s lawsuit in 2020 accusing Apple of violating antitrust law with its tight controls over how consumers download apps and pay for transactions within them.
The Apple filing criticised what it called an attempt by Epic to make Apple’s “tools and technologies available to developers for free”.
Epic, it said, wanted the court “to micromanage Apple’s business operations in a way that would increase Epic’s profitability”.
Epic declined to comment. Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the dispute, part of a long fight between the two companies.
Epic largely lost its case against Apple, but Rogers in 2021 ordered Apple to give developers greater freedom to guide app users to alternative payment methods for digital goods.
The US Supreme Court in January declined to hear Apple’s appeal of the injunction order.
Epic said in a court filing last month that Cupertino, California-based Apple was in “blatant violation” of the court’s injunction. It pointed to Apple’s imposition of a 27% fee on developers for some purchases, which the video game maker said makes links for alternative payment options “commercially unusable”.
Epic also alleged Apple barred some apps from informing users about other ways to pay for goods.
Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Elon Musk’s X and Match Group last month echoed Epic’s arguments, telling Rogers that Apple was in “clear violation” of the court’s order.
In a similar case that Epic brought against Alphabet’s Google, a judge in San Francisco is expected this year to issue a separate injunction affecting the Google Play Store.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Apple urges California judge to reject Epic Games’ bid to hold it in contempt
The iPhone maker denies violating a court order to give developers greater freedom to guide app users to alternative payment methods for digital goods
iPhone maker Apple on Friday denied violating a court order governing its App Store and urged a California federal judge to reject a request by Fortnite developer Epic Games to hold it in contempt.
Apple made the arguments in a filing to US district judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, who presided over Epic’s lawsuit in 2020 accusing Apple of violating antitrust law with its tight controls over how consumers download apps and pay for transactions within them.
The Apple filing criticised what it called an attempt by Epic to make Apple’s “tools and technologies available to developers for free”.
Epic, it said, wanted the court “to micromanage Apple’s business operations in a way that would increase Epic’s profitability”.
Epic declined to comment. Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the dispute, part of a long fight between the two companies.
Epic largely lost its case against Apple, but Rogers in 2021 ordered Apple to give developers greater freedom to guide app users to alternative payment methods for digital goods.
The US Supreme Court in January declined to hear Apple’s appeal of the injunction order.
Epic said in a court filing last month that Cupertino, California-based Apple was in “blatant violation” of the court’s injunction. It pointed to Apple’s imposition of a 27% fee on developers for some purchases, which the video game maker said makes links for alternative payment options “commercially unusable”.
Epic also alleged Apple barred some apps from informing users about other ways to pay for goods.
Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Elon Musk’s X and Match Group last month echoed Epic’s arguments, telling Rogers that Apple was in “clear violation” of the court’s order.
In a similar case that Epic brought against Alphabet’s Google, a judge in San Francisco is expected this year to issue a separate injunction affecting the Google Play Store.
Reuters
Apple warns of severe ‘mercenary spyware attack’ on users in 92 countries
Disney boardroom battle set for dramatic conclusion
Google agrees to pay $700m after accusations of overcharging
EU tech law leads to surge in independent browsers
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Apple warns of severe ‘mercenary spyware attack’ on users in 92 countries
EU tech law leads to surge in independent browsers
TSMC to make advanced semiconductors in US
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.