How Nedbank’s Mike Brown would save Eskom
The Nedbank CEO Mike Brown believes the beleaguered utility can be saved but questions whether its current model is appropriate
Ask Nedbank Group CEO Mike Brown how to save beleaguered Eskom and his approach is simple: first, give it cash and then consider a debt-to-equity swap later.
Eskom is paying so much in interest on its debt — at the same time that its income is falling — that the company is struggling to keep the country’s lights on. To ease the firm’s cash-flow woes, the government is planning a R230bn bailout. While the state initially wanted to spread that over 10 years, a significant portion is now being expedited, with details expected from National Treasury on July 23.
“For all practical purposes, we don’t have any easy or good options available at this stage,” Brown said in an interview on Friday. Bringing forward the bailout package or increasing the amount “is the most practical short-term solution”.
PODCAST | Business Day Spotlight - “Eskom is South Africa’s Brexit”
Other suggestions are being considered to ease Eskom from the burden of more than R440bn of debt, 70% of which is guaranteed by the state. One includes a proposal to convert debt held in Eskom on behalf of more than 1-million state workers into equity. Another is said to include shutting coal-fired plants early to get cheaper financing and to make way for renewable energy.
Green energy is a “possible alternative but incredibly complicated to implement and likely to take three to five years to get up and running”, Brown said. “Eskom has a six-month problem.”
While “some form of switch where Eskom bondholders would be able to switch Eskom bonds for government bonds” presents a potential answer, it is also complex and would take longer to get done than releasing the bailout funding through the special appropriations bill, the CEO said.
The Public Investment Corporation (PIC), which manages about $150bn mainly in civil servants’ pensions, might take a hit should the Eskom debt it holds be converted to shares, said Richard Segal, a London-based senior emerging-markets analyst at Manulife Asset Management.
“The equity value is likely to be lower than the debt value,” he said. “This might not sit well” with trustees of the retirement funds.
It could lead to some positive changes at Eskom if PIC gains board representation and some management control, Segal said, “although it could also lead to board fights, which make the situation worse”.
Eskom would need to be completely reorganised for a debt-to-equity switch to happen, which could still be years away, said Darias Jonker, a London-based director at consultant Eurasia Group, especially considering unions are completely opposed to any reconfiguration at Eskom. A World Bank study in 2016 found the company needs to cut 66% of its workforce.
“There will not be a definitive deal to make the debt sustainable, in other words, debt that can be wholly serviced from Eskom’s revenue in the next 12-24 months,” he said. Even the “enhanced bailout” scheduled to be detailed in coming weeks, “will not be enough to make the debt sustainable”.
While Nedbank’s Brown is optimistic, the government will have to make hard decisions, with the burden ultimately falling on the SA public to shoulder the bill.
“Eskom can be saved but I don’t believe an Eskom in its current model is appropriate for SA into the future,” he said. “It will be about the business model on the one hand and paying the price for Eskom’s debt levels. Taxpayers are the only place Eskom will go to for funding over time.”