Space robotics firm Astrobotic considers ‘alternative mission profiles’ after technical difficulties cast doubt on lunar landing
08 January 2024 - 21:51
byJoey Roulette
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
The Vulcan rocket is launched on its debut flight from Cape Canaveral, Florida, the US, January 8 2024. Picture: JOE SKIPPER/REUTERS
Washington — A robotic lander built by a private company suffered a propulsion system issue on its way to the moon on Monday, upending the first US soft lunar landing attempt in over 50 years as mission managers scrambled to fix its position in space.
Space robotics firm Astrobotic Technology's Peregrine lunar lander had launched successfully to space at 2.18am from Cape Canaveral, Florida, aboard the first flight of Vulcan, a rocket that had been under development for a decade by the Boeing and Lockheed Martin joint venture United Launch Alliance (ULA).
But hours after separating from Vulcan, Astrobotic said issues with Peregrine’s propulsion system briefly prevented the spacecraft from angling itself towards the sun for power.
While mission engineers regained control, the faulty propulsion system is losing valuable propellant, forcing Astrobotic to consider “alternative mission profiles”, suggesting a moon landing is no longer achievable.
The launch of Vulcan, a 60m tall rocket with engines made by Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin, was a crucial first for ULA, which developed Vulcan to replace its workhorse Atlas V rocket and rival the reusable Falcon 9 from Elon Musk’s SpaceX in the satellite launch market.
The stakes of the mission were high for Vulcan. Boeing and Lockheed, which own ULA in a 50-50 split, have been seeking a sale of the business for roughly a year. The launch was the first of two certification flights required by the US Space Force before Vulcan can fly lucrative missions for the Pentagon, a key customer.
A successful launch of the moon lander, which ULA agreed to fly at a roughly 50% discount given the risks of flying on a new rocket, allows the company to start fulfilling a multibillion-dollar backlog of about 70 missions booked already. Vulcan sells for at least $110m per launch.
Vulcan’s placement of the Peregrine lander into orbit was “dead on bullseye”, ULA CEO Tory Bruno said. “This has been years of hard work,” he added from the company's launch control room after launch.
But the lander itself, after being released from the rocket, failed to enter its correct sun-facing orientation in space and saw its battery levels plummet, hours after it made successful contact with ground teams and activated its propulsion system, Astrobotic said in a statement.
As Astrobitc was working to confirm the propulsion system issue, it said such a problem “threatens the ability of the spacecraft to soft land on the moon”.
It said in a later update that engineers had regained control of the spacecraft to allow it to charge its batteries. While Peregrine remains in Earth's orbit, “we have prioritised maximising the science and data we can capture”, Astrobotic said.
Setting off for a 46-day trek on Monday, Peregrine was poised to mark the first US soft landing on the moon since the final Apollo mission in 1972, and the first-ever lunar landing by a private company — a feat that has proved elusive in recent years.
“This is the moment we’ve been waiting for 16 years,” Astrobotic CEO John Thornton said after the lander’s launch.
The mission is the latest in recent years among countries and private companies sprinting to the moon, a renewed stage of international competition in which scientists hope the moon's water-bearing minerals can be exploited to sustain long-term astronaut missions.
Peregrine was set to land on the moon on February 23 with 20 payloads aboard, most of which were designed to gather data about the lunar surface ahead of planned future human missions. If successful, it would mark the first trek to the moon’s surface as part of Nasa’s Artemis moon programme.
That multibillion-dollar programme, involving various countries and relying heavily on private companies such as SpaceX, envisions astronaut missions to the moon later this decade. Small landers such as Peregrine are expected to get there first.
A second private US company under the same Nasa programme expects to launch a lander of its own in February. Carrying similar NASA payloads and launching to space aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9, Houston-based Intuitive Machines’ said its spacecraft could make a moon landing on February 22, a day before Peregrine’s planned arrival.
India last year became the fourth country to achieve a soft lunar landing after Russia failed in an attempt the same month. The US, China and the former Soviet Union are the only other countries that have carried out successful soft lunar landings.
Private companies with hopes of spurring a lunar marketplace have had harder times, with Japan’s ispace and an Israeli company crash-landing on their first attempts.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
US moon lander mission suffers ‘critical’ setback
Space robotics firm Astrobotic considers ‘alternative mission profiles’ after technical difficulties cast doubt on lunar landing
Washington — A robotic lander built by a private company suffered a propulsion system issue on its way to the moon on Monday, upending the first US soft lunar landing attempt in over 50 years as mission managers scrambled to fix its position in space.
Space robotics firm Astrobotic Technology's Peregrine lunar lander had launched successfully to space at 2.18am from Cape Canaveral, Florida, aboard the first flight of Vulcan, a rocket that had been under development for a decade by the Boeing and Lockheed Martin joint venture United Launch Alliance (ULA).
But hours after separating from Vulcan, Astrobotic said issues with Peregrine’s propulsion system briefly prevented the spacecraft from angling itself towards the sun for power.
While mission engineers regained control, the faulty propulsion system is losing valuable propellant, forcing Astrobotic to consider “alternative mission profiles”, suggesting a moon landing is no longer achievable.
The launch of Vulcan, a 60m tall rocket with engines made by Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin, was a crucial first for ULA, which developed Vulcan to replace its workhorse Atlas V rocket and rival the reusable Falcon 9 from Elon Musk’s SpaceX in the satellite launch market.
The stakes of the mission were high for Vulcan. Boeing and Lockheed, which own ULA in a 50-50 split, have been seeking a sale of the business for roughly a year. The launch was the first of two certification flights required by the US Space Force before Vulcan can fly lucrative missions for the Pentagon, a key customer.
A successful launch of the moon lander, which ULA agreed to fly at a roughly 50% discount given the risks of flying on a new rocket, allows the company to start fulfilling a multibillion-dollar backlog of about 70 missions booked already. Vulcan sells for at least $110m per launch.
Vulcan’s placement of the Peregrine lander into orbit was “dead on bullseye”, ULA CEO Tory Bruno said. “This has been years of hard work,” he added from the company's launch control room after launch.
But the lander itself, after being released from the rocket, failed to enter its correct sun-facing orientation in space and saw its battery levels plummet, hours after it made successful contact with ground teams and activated its propulsion system, Astrobotic said in a statement.
As Astrobitc was working to confirm the propulsion system issue, it said such a problem “threatens the ability of the spacecraft to soft land on the moon”.
It said in a later update that engineers had regained control of the spacecraft to allow it to charge its batteries. While Peregrine remains in Earth's orbit, “we have prioritised maximising the science and data we can capture”, Astrobotic said.
Setting off for a 46-day trek on Monday, Peregrine was poised to mark the first US soft landing on the moon since the final Apollo mission in 1972, and the first-ever lunar landing by a private company — a feat that has proved elusive in recent years.
“This is the moment we’ve been waiting for 16 years,” Astrobotic CEO John Thornton said after the lander’s launch.
The mission is the latest in recent years among countries and private companies sprinting to the moon, a renewed stage of international competition in which scientists hope the moon's water-bearing minerals can be exploited to sustain long-term astronaut missions.
Peregrine was set to land on the moon on February 23 with 20 payloads aboard, most of which were designed to gather data about the lunar surface ahead of planned future human missions. If successful, it would mark the first trek to the moon’s surface as part of Nasa’s Artemis moon programme.
That multibillion-dollar programme, involving various countries and relying heavily on private companies such as SpaceX, envisions astronaut missions to the moon later this decade. Small landers such as Peregrine are expected to get there first.
A second private US company under the same Nasa programme expects to launch a lander of its own in February. Carrying similar NASA payloads and launching to space aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9, Houston-based Intuitive Machines’ said its spacecraft could make a moon landing on February 22, a day before Peregrine’s planned arrival.
India last year became the fourth country to achieve a soft lunar landing after Russia failed in an attempt the same month. The US, China and the former Soviet Union are the only other countries that have carried out successful soft lunar landings.
Private companies with hopes of spurring a lunar marketplace have had harder times, with Japan’s ispace and an Israeli company crash-landing on their first attempts.
Reuters
Vulcan rocket sends privately built robotic Moon lander to space
US military’s secretive spaceplane launched on possible higher-orbit mission
China’s youngest astronauts soar to space
Rocket Lab shares plunge after mission ended minutes after launch
SpaceX Starship probe in US ends with 63 regulatory fixes
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.