Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
An antimissile system operates after Iran launched drones and missiles towards Israel, as seen from Ashkelon, Israel, April 14 2024. Picture: REUTERS/AMIR COHEN
Iran must have known that its low and slow drones and cruise missiles would get knocked down by the Iron Dome defence system and fighter jets. So, was this a pre-planned symbolic attack, or has Iran shown the weakness of its armoury by mistake?
Perhaps it was hoping the Israelis would run out of “bullets”, or since those “bullets” cost $30,000 a pop, maybe the idea was to bankrupt the enemy. US President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continue their political wrestling match without any sign of who might win.
Israel has forced the US to come to its defence in a fight, while it is adamant it won’t help in an attack. The political backchat and arm twisting must be epic. The big question of course is whether Israel can be restrained from starting a larger conflict.
It is probably even money, but my mother told me never to gamble.
Bernard Benson Parklands
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: A symbolic attack by Iran?
The huge but ineffective attack by Iran on Israel on April 13 raises a number of interesting questions (“US says it won’t take part in retaliation”, April 14).
Iran must have known that its low and slow drones and cruise missiles would get knocked down by the Iron Dome defence system and fighter jets. So, was this a pre-planned symbolic attack, or has Iran shown the weakness of its armoury by mistake?
Perhaps it was hoping the Israelis would run out of “bullets”, or since those “bullets” cost $30,000 a pop, maybe the idea was to bankrupt the enemy. US President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continue their political wrestling match without any sign of who might win.
Israel has forced the US to come to its defence in a fight, while it is adamant it won’t help in an attack. The political backchat and arm twisting must be epic. The big question of course is whether Israel can be restrained from starting a larger conflict.
It is probably even money, but my mother told me never to gamble.
Bernard Benson
Parklands
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
How severe will Israel’s reprisal attack on Iran be?
Crew of ship seized by Iran safe, operator MSC says
Timeline: Iran launches direct attack on Israel
Israeli war cabinet delays third meeting on Iran’s attack
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
US will not take part in any Israeli retaliatory action against Iran
Gauteng should pray for no escalation of Middle East conflict, says economist
Iran warns US and Israel against retaliation after attack
Step on the brakes, Europe urges Israel
The genesis of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.