Google ordered to disclose e-mails in Russian oligarch’s £450m divorce
Tatiana Akhmedova’s pursuit of the e-mail accounts is part of one of London’s largest divorce fights
San Jose — Google was ordered by a US judge to turn over the content of e-mails of the son of Farkhad Akhmedov to the Russian oligarch’s former wife in her pursuit of a £450m divorce judgment.
The skirmish over the e-mail accounts is part of one of London’s largest divorce fights — involving a super yacht in Dubai and litigation funder Burford Capital — which landed before a judge in San Jose, California, in the federal court closest to Google’s Mountain View headquarters 22km away.
Tatiana Akhmedova alleges that her former husband transferred assets to their son, Temur, to avoid paying a London court’s judgment that she says remains “almost entirely unsatisfied.”
US judge Virginia M DeMarchi said she was inclined to comply with the London court’s ruling allowing Akhmedova to seek her son’s e-mails from Google. The judge said the information released should not go beyond the requirements of the litigation in London.
The information from the e-mails will be used to learn whether Temur assisted his father in the fraudulent transfer of assets, and if so, to win a judgment against him, Tatiana Akhmedova said in a filing.
DeMarchi’s ruling follows a search of Temur’s apartment by his mother’s legal team that was authorised by a London judge who has accused the son, a financier, of destroying evidence, according to a report in the Times of London.
A representative of Temur Akhmedov said the US suit was an attempt “to find ‘evidence’ against him which simply does not exist”.
“As a result of this latest Google hearing, Temur hopes his mother and her backers will enjoy reading the contents of his old high school e-mail account,” the representative said in an e-mailed statement.
Google argued that it is forbidden under US law from disclosing contents of a communication without an account user’s “express consent”.
Julie E Schwartz, a lawyer for Google, told DeMarchi that Google faces legal liability for improperly disclosing the information. “This has broader implications than just this case here today,” she added.
In her order, DeMarchi wrote that Temur Akhmedov’s “generally unco-operative behaviour” in the British litigation proceeding doesn’t have any bearing on her decision, which instead turns on whether the accounts are his and whether he agreed to Google turning over the information they contain.
“Google points to no evidence suggesting that Mr Akhmedov is not the owner of the accounts, and he has clearly and expressly consented to production of their contents,” DeMarchi wrote.
Albert Gidari of Stanford University’s Center for Internet and Society said the judge probably didn’t want to hold up a trial set for November 30 in London.
“No-one should read this decision as open season on compelled disclosure of user content in discovery proceedings,” Gidari said in an e-mail. “To the contrary, the case stands for the unremarkable proposition that if a party can prove ownership of an account, and show discovery from the user can’t be had through other means, the party can obtain provider assistance through court proceedings.”
Google didn’t respond to a request for comment about the ruling.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.