Most people in modern society, I guess, think the interests of consumers, investors and employees are a zero-sum game; any gain by one would result in an equivalent loss by the other two. It seems so obvious. A company increases its profit by charging more for its products; that profit is handed over to investors. The result is that investors are happy; consumers less so. Or the company hands over the profit increase to its employees or more likely its managers with the same result. Put the other way around, it needs to “exploit” its employees, and the more it does so, the more profit it makes. It's logical, right? Because this notion is so entrenched in politics around the world, it’s refreshing to meet people such as outgoing Unilever CEO Paul Polman whose root philosophy was and it remains the precise opposite. Of course, profit increases do mean more dividends for investors. But the point is that all the inherent levers of action pull not against each other but towards each othe...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.