Foundation to continue with legal challenge to termination of ZEP
Extension of the Zimbabwe Exemption Permit to June 2023 doesn’t cure defects in minister’s decision to end the permit, Helen Suzman Foundation director says
20 September 2022 - 18:37
by Linda Ensor
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Home affairs minister Aaron Motsoaledi. Picture: TREVOR SAMSON
The Helen Suzman Foundation will pursue its legal challenge of the termination of the Zimbabwe Exemption Permit (ZEP) despite home affairs minister Aaron Motsoaledi extending the permit to June 2023, foundation director Nicole Fritz said on Tuesday.
The termination of the ZEP will affect about 178 000 Zimbabweans, who have lived and worked in SA for over a decade,
“The extension of the ZEP to 30 June 2023 while potentially holding out some relief to individual ZEP holders does not, in our view, cure the fundamental defects in the minister’s decision to end the permit and so the court action continues,” Fritz said in a statement after her comments in an opinion piece on the News24 website on Tuesday.
“The primary defect, not remedied by the extension, is that these decisions have been taken without any form of public consultation whatsoever — no prior notice, no calls for representations from affected ZEP holders, no notice and comment process, no public inquiries and no meaningful engagement with civil society,” she added.
“This flies in the face of the most basic tenets of procedural fairness and ensures an uninformed decision. The extension also fails to demonstrate any more compelling reasons in support of the decision to end the ZEP than was the case before the extension was granted and, without more, it doesn’t genuinely offer ZEP holders any greater an opportunity to migrate to other visas or secure individual waivers and exemptions and so regularise their status.”
Lawful status
Fritz said the legal challenge is being brought in the interests of ZEP holders who have lived in SA lawfully for more than a decade and have contributed to the country in many ways. At the very least they deserved to be heard and consulted ahead of any potential decision which would impose enormous harm on them, she added.
‘Very little reason has been proffered by the department for the decision to terminate the ZEP. In fact, in an about-turn, it now says that it made no decision, it simply allowed the ZEP to lapse and so essentially it needs no reason,” Fritz said.
“But without reason, without hard data supporting this decision, we have no way of assessing whether it is net positive or net negative for SA.
“The minister has vaguely gestured to unemployment and crime at different points as some sort of justification. But there’s no data to support such reasons and in their legal papers the department appears wisely to have abandoned such explanation, she added.
“Bad decisions taken by government — decisions without considered reason and deliberation — impact us negatively even if we are not the direct targets. They consume finite resources, human and financial.”
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Foundation to continue with legal challenge to termination of ZEP
Extension of the Zimbabwe Exemption Permit to June 2023 doesn’t cure defects in minister’s decision to end the permit, Helen Suzman Foundation director says
The Helen Suzman Foundation will pursue its legal challenge of the termination of the Zimbabwe Exemption Permit (ZEP) despite home affairs minister Aaron Motsoaledi extending the permit to June 2023, foundation director Nicole Fritz said on Tuesday.
The termination of the ZEP will affect about 178 000 Zimbabweans, who have lived and worked in SA for over a decade,
“The extension of the ZEP to 30 June 2023 while potentially holding out some relief to individual ZEP holders does not, in our view, cure the fundamental defects in the minister’s decision to end the permit and so the court action continues,” Fritz said in a statement after her comments in an opinion piece on the News24 website on Tuesday.
“The primary defect, not remedied by the extension, is that these decisions have been taken without any form of public consultation whatsoever — no prior notice, no calls for representations from affected ZEP holders, no notice and comment process, no public inquiries and no meaningful engagement with civil society,” she added.
“This flies in the face of the most basic tenets of procedural fairness and ensures an uninformed decision. The extension also fails to demonstrate any more compelling reasons in support of the decision to end the ZEP than was the case before the extension was granted and, without more, it doesn’t genuinely offer ZEP holders any greater an opportunity to migrate to other visas or secure individual waivers and exemptions and so regularise their status.”
Lawful status
Fritz said the legal challenge is being brought in the interests of ZEP holders who have lived in SA lawfully for more than a decade and have contributed to the country in many ways. At the very least they deserved to be heard and consulted ahead of any potential decision which would impose enormous harm on them, she added.
‘Very little reason has been proffered by the department for the decision to terminate the ZEP. In fact, in an about-turn, it now says that it made no decision, it simply allowed the ZEP to lapse and so essentially it needs no reason,” Fritz said.
“But without reason, without hard data supporting this decision, we have no way of assessing whether it is net positive or net negative for SA.
“The minister has vaguely gestured to unemployment and crime at different points as some sort of justification. But there’s no data to support such reasons and in their legal papers the department appears wisely to have abandoned such explanation, she added.
“Bad decisions taken by government — decisions without considered reason and deliberation — impact us negatively even if we are not the direct targets. They consume finite resources, human and financial.”
ensorl@businesslive.co.za
Motsoaledi says Zimbabweans not in SA legally will be punished
ZEP extension is not due to lawsuits against home affairs ministry, says Motsoaledi
Home affairs to end 178,000 Zimbabwe exemption permits in December
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Employ locals or pay up, says Thulas Nxesi
No xenophobia in plan to end most special immigration permits, SA says
Home affairs to end 178,000 Zimbabwe exemption permits in December
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.