If you’re looking for a crash course in executive moral relativism, you might want to spend a few hours watching the recording of Markus Jooste testifying in parliament last week. There is a moment, early on, when Steinhoff’s former CEO is testifying about his anger at the retailer’s auditor, Deloitte, saying it’s not going to sign off the accounts, and that it wants a new forensic investigation into allegations of fraud. The background is that over the preceding months, Deloitte had been tipped off to "irregularities" within Steinhoff’s accounts. (You know: overstated revenues, forged documents, inflated asset values.) So Deloitte demands another forensic investigation. How does Jooste respond? Perhaps to say to Deloitte: "By all means — here are the keys to the office, go wild"? Well, no. Instead, as he explained: "My personal view was that Deloitte’s mandate should be terminated at that moment in time and we should appoint alternative auditors." That new auditor, he said, would t...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.