Naspers directors’ ability to exercise their options so profitably now, should they want to do that, is not due to their own efforts
02 February 2023 - 05:00
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Basil Sgourdos isn’t in any danger of having a rocky financial start to the year.
Last week the Naspers CFO cashed in 27,360 share options awarded to him in 2013, netting a little over R74m.
Of course, directors are able to, and should, diversify their earnings, particularly if their wealth is tied to one particular share.
What makes Sgourdos’s action objectionable is that Naspers and Prosus are in the midst of a multibillion-dollar share buyback, which has helped resuscitate the stock after its lows of last year.
It means Sgourdos and his fellow directors, should they exercise options, are guaranteed a chunky payday through no efforts of their own but rather due to the way shareholder funds are being used.
Of course, Naspers’s rally this year is not only due to its buyback programme but also to the reinflation experienced by China’s Tencent, whose stock has soared an eye-watering 54% this year.
It raises the question, again, of whether Naspers’s executives are having any positive effect on the business at all. And if not, do they deserve these colossal paydays?
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
EDITORIAL: Basil Sgourdos’s richly undeserved payday
Naspers directors’ ability to exercise their options so profitably now, should they want to do that, is not due to their own efforts
Basil Sgourdos isn’t in any danger of having a rocky financial start to the year.
Last week the Naspers CFO cashed in 27,360 share options awarded to him in 2013, netting a little over R74m.
Of course, directors are able to, and should, diversify their earnings, particularly if their wealth is tied to one particular share.
What makes Sgourdos’s action objectionable is that Naspers and Prosus are in the midst of a multibillion-dollar share buyback, which has helped resuscitate the stock after its lows of last year.
It means Sgourdos and his fellow directors, should they exercise options, are guaranteed a chunky payday through no efforts of their own but rather due to the way shareholder funds are being used.
Of course, Naspers’s rally this year is not only due to its buyback programme but also to the reinflation experienced by China’s Tencent, whose stock has soared an eye-watering 54% this year.
It raises the question, again, of whether Naspers’s executives are having any positive effect on the business at all. And if not, do they deserve these colossal paydays?
Bob van Dijk’s R229m Naspers windfall
Emboldened investors boost value of Naspers stable by R197bn
Companies in this Story
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.