Remarkably, given that it is the single largest shareholder in China’s most valuable company, Naspers has never been given a mention in the media of that country. Until, that is, the day after it offloaded 190m Tencent shares. "Tencent drops 4% on Naspers’s stake-cut plan", shouted the headline in the business section of China Daily. For many among the former Naspers board it may have been a chilling confirmation of why they were right to fight to prolong undisputed control over the company; why for so long they treated the N-shareholders as hangers-on with few rights. For much of the past 15 years it has been important for the Chinese that Naspers did not exhibit all the characteristics of a listed entity; that the executive team and controlling shareholders behind the Tencent acquisition were not susceptible to the normal cut-and-thrust of listed life and that they were not likely to be booted out in a hostile shareholder battle such as that threatened by Jannie Mouton in 2006. Th...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.