Back in late 2016, I attended a very uncomfortable Invicta Holdings AGM. I had just written a cover story on the industrial supplies conglomerate that highlighted the stark difference in perceptions between the Invicta executives and some of its minority shareholders around the detail issued on a reportable irregularity raised on part of a share repurchase exercise. Invicta chair and major shareholder Christo Wiese dismissed my effort as making a mountain out of a molehill. The issue, really, was that Invicta did not offer a surfeit of detail on the reportable irregularity in its financial statements … or even at the AGM. Wiese asked me: "What sort of detail do you want … what more do you want to know?" For those who need reminding, Invicta positions held by certain deep-leveraged Invicta executives (present and former) were involuntarily closed out by financial institutions, and sold into the market. Supposedly these shares were inadvertently bought back as part of a share repurcha...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.