It’s not often that a mild-mannered accountant gets to stare down a bullying trillion-rand company. Yet David Smith, an equities analyst at Investec Securities, has resisted a full-throttle onslaught from Naspers, which took exception to a 30-page report he wrote on January 22 that failed to flatter the R1.4 trillion tech goliath as it presumably might like. Smith argued that Naspers isn’t as grievously undervalued as some say, and it "deserves" to trade at a 30% discount to its assets. He also argued that its internal rate of return is closer to 11% than the higher 17% Naspers puts it at — an important gap, considering Naspers’s cost of capital is 13%. It wasn’t flattering, sure. But equities analysts are not there to soothe egos. Rather, they’re meant to act independently, their research contributing towards price discovery and a more transparent market. The thing is, for the past two years the gains in Naspers’s share price have been entirely due to its high-flying Chinese invest...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.