Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Nairobi — Some US companies buying minerals from countries including the Democratic Republic of Congo and its eastern neighbours are still failing to properly authenticate that the metals do not come from conflict zones, the US government accountability office says in a report.
A number of companies sourcing minerals such as tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold are also failing to meet disclosure requirements with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on their activities, the government accountability office said in its analysis.
US-listed companies are obliged to inform the SEC and investors that minerals entering the global supply chain are not from mines that use child labour and fund armed groups.
Due diligence to check if the minerals originate from conflict zones could be done using supplier surveys, smelter and refinery audits as well as traceability methods.
Some companies are facing challenges conducting due diligence and while some reports go beyond SEC rules, there are others that don’t file reports at all, the government accountability office said.
This is mostly due to “difficulties getting needed information because of lack of access to suppliers and complex supply chains”, it said.
“Some industry stakeholders noted that other companies may be reporting incomplete information, or not filing at all because of a perception that they are unlikely to face enforcement action by the SEC if they do not comply with the conflict minerals disclosure requirements.”
Global manufacturers are under pressure to show that metals used in products such as laptops, video game consoles or battery electric vehicles are sourced responsibly.
The US law requires listed companies to disclose whether their products contained tantalum, tin, tungsten or gold from Congo and its East African neighbours because of the role the minerals play in fuelling conflicts in the region.
An estimated 53% of companies that conducted due diligence last year “ultimately could not determine whether any of the conflict minerals used in their products may have originated in covered countries”, the government accountability office report said.
It also found that an estimated 35% of companies reported that their minerals may have originated in covered countries.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
US companies flouting conflict minerals rules
Nairobi — Some US companies buying minerals from countries including the Democratic Republic of Congo and its eastern neighbours are still failing to properly authenticate that the metals do not come from conflict zones, the US government accountability office says in a report.
A number of companies sourcing minerals such as tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold are also failing to meet disclosure requirements with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on their activities, the government accountability office said in its analysis.
US-listed companies are obliged to inform the SEC and investors that minerals entering the global supply chain are not from mines that use child labour and fund armed groups.
Due diligence to check if the minerals originate from conflict zones could be done using supplier surveys, smelter and refinery audits as well as traceability methods.
Some companies are facing challenges conducting due diligence and while some reports go beyond SEC rules, there are others that don’t file reports at all, the government accountability office said.
This is mostly due to “difficulties getting needed information because of lack of access to suppliers and complex supply chains”, it said.
“Some industry stakeholders noted that other companies may be reporting incomplete information, or not filing at all because of a perception that they are unlikely to face enforcement action by the SEC if they do not comply with the conflict minerals disclosure requirements.”
Global manufacturers are under pressure to show that metals used in products such as laptops, video game consoles or battery electric vehicles are sourced responsibly.
The US law requires listed companies to disclose whether their products contained tantalum, tin, tungsten or gold from Congo and its East African neighbours because of the role the minerals play in fuelling conflicts in the region.
An estimated 53% of companies that conducted due diligence last year “ultimately could not determine whether any of the conflict minerals used in their products may have originated in covered countries”, the government accountability office report said.
It also found that an estimated 35% of companies reported that their minerals may have originated in covered countries.
Reuters
Warburg Pincus names next-gen insider Jeffrey Perlman as its president
Microsoft and Activision extend $69bn deal deadline
Chechen leader’s nephew to lead seized Danone unit in Russia
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Microsoft and Activision extend $69bn deal deadline
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.