Defence force intervention in Cape Flats must have ‘element of surprise’
Defence minister says with the high crime rate in Cape Town it was appropriate for the SANDF to be deployed to support the police
The delay in the deployment of soldiers in the Cape Flats to help police clamp down on gangsterism, which has led to a spate of murders over the past two weeks, was intended to introduce an element of surprise, defence minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula said on Wednesday.
The minister was addressing a media briefing on Wednesday ahead of her budget vote speech in the National Assembly.
Following the announcement of the deployment last week at least 43 people were killed in Cape Town between Friday and Monday. This was also despite a heightened police presence in some of the city’s most violent areas, such as Philippi where 13 people were killed the previous weekend.
The SA National Defence Force (SANDF) troops assembled in Cape Town on Monday ahead of their deployment, which the minister said was intended to act as a deterrent and to stabilise the situation.
“As far as we are concerned the kind of criminality that has been going on here, the fact that we are ruled by gangs in the Western Cape, points to the fact that there is a serious undermining of the authority of the state.”
In this situation it was appropriate for the SANDF to be deployed to support the police, Mapisa-Nqakula said.
The withdrawal of the troops would be driven by intelligence on the ground.
Police minister Bheki Cele announced in his budget vote speech last Thursday that President Cyril Ramaphosa had approved the deployment of soldiers in gang-infested areas of the Cape Flats to help with police operations over the next three months.
The 10 areas where they will be present include Bishop Lavis, Mitchells Plain, Delft, Elsies River, Nyanga. Khayelitsha, Mfuleni, Philippi, Kraaifontein and Manenberg.
Mapisa-Nqakula highlighted the issue of the department’s declining budget saying that the defence force was becoming “progressively more unsustainable”.
“We have now reached the point where the republic must decide on the kind of defence force it wants and what it can afford.
“We need a frank discussion very soon as we risk the irreversible damage to the defence force as a whole. A comparative analysis of our SADC [Southern African Development Community] partners indicates how underfunded the SANDF is. Regional defence budgets are increasing whilst our defence budget is declining.”
Specific threats faced by SA included porous borders, and terrorism and fundamentalism by extremist groups which was looming large. More troops were needed to patrol the borders.
DA defence spokesperson Kobus Marais also highlighted the problem of underfunding of the SANDF warning that the defence department was facing a “day zero” scenario.
“Comparable countries with a GDP growth rate of 3% to 4% spend 2% to 3% of their annual GDP on their defence budget. SA has a GDP growth rate of around 1%, but only allocates 0.93% of its annual GDP to the department of defence.
“We must realize we are approaching the cliff at an alarming pace. Our defence industry, a potentially significant contributor to economic growth and job creation, can no longer depend on the procurement by the SANDF, and we see more and more South African designed and manufactured defence equipment being used by foreign nations,” Marais said.
He said the SANDF required about R80bn to fund their programmes and projects but only R50.5bn, or 62%, was approved with inadequate provision for the acquisition of equipment.
With Aron Hyman